1,720,981 research outputs found
Factitious hypermineralocorticoidism due to transdermal application of a 9-alpha-prednisolone containing ointment.
Naloxone does not modify the antihypertensive effect of captopril in essential hypertensive patients
It has been reported that endogenous opioid antagonism through naloxone (NAL) blunts the hypotensive effect of captopril (CAP) in normal man. For this reason a study was carried out to determine whether NAL interacts with the antihypertensive effect of CAP in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (n = 6; age 22-43 years). Patients received, according to a randomized code, placebo (PL) during saline infusion, CAP (25 mg orally) during saline infusion, PL + NAL (0.4 mg as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 4.0 mg/h for 2 h) and CAP + NAL at the same doses. Three-day intervals elapsed between each phase of the study. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before (-20 to 0 min) and every 15 min for the next 2 h after drug administration. Blood samples for plasma renin activity (PRA), noradrenaline (NA) and aldosterone (ALD) were collected before (time 0) and 120 min after drug administration. Neither PL nor NAL changed any of the parameters examined, while CAP alone reduced mean BP to a highly significant extent. Naloxone did not change the hypotensive effect of CAP to any significant extent. Captropril, either alone or associated with NAL, tended to reduce plasma ALD and increase PRA (P less than 0.05) without changing HR or plasma NA. These data indicate that, at least under the experimental conditions used, endogenous opioid antagonism does not interfere with the haemodynamic and humoral effect of CAP in essential hypertensive man. This suggests that endogenous opioids do not mediate the pharmacological actions of CAP
Vascular responses to ouabain and norepinephrine in low and normal renin hypertension.
A circulating Na+, K+-ATPase inhibitor may cause arterial hypertension in patients with suppressed plasma renin activity, either directly or by sensitizing peripheral vessels to alpha-adrenergic stimulation. This hypothesis was tested by evaluating forearm arteriolar (plethysmographic technique) response to exogenous alpha-adrenergic stimulation by a 2-minute intra-arterial infusion of norepinephrine (0.1 microgram/dl tissue per minute) and to Na+, K+-ATPase inhibition by sequential 20-minute intra-arterial infusions of ouabain (0.36 and 0.72 microgram/dl tissue per minute). Two groups of hypertensive subjects with suppressed plasma renin activity, either essential or secondary to aldosterone excess, were compared with age-matched and sex-matched hypertensive subjects with normal plasma renin activity (n = 7 per group). No significant differences in forearm vascular response to norepinephrine were found among the three groups. Ouabain caused a highly significant, dose-related increment in forearm vascular resistance that was not accompanied by changes in the contralateral limb or systemic blood pressure. No significant interindividual differences in vascular responsiveness to ouabain were found. The individual increments in forearm vascular resistance during ouabain administration were unrelated to basal values or to plasma aldosterone, norepinephrine, or potassium concentrations. These data are not consistent with the hypothesis that suppressed basal Na+, K+-ATPase activity is primarily a characteristic of hypertensive patients with unresponsive plasma renin activity. Overall, these results cast doubts on the possibility of linking the development of human low renin hypertension to an endogenous Na+, K+-ATPase inhibitor
Verapamil antagonizes forearm vasoconstriction mediated by selective alpha 1- and alpha 2-agonists in hypertensive patients.
Calcium channel blocking agents preferentially antagonize alpha 2-mediated pressor responses in various animal species. Whether the same happens in man is not clear. For this reason we studied the interference exerted by verapamil, a calcium entry blocker, on forearm vasoconstriction mediated by selective alpha 1- (methoxamine) and alpha 2- (B-HT 933) adrenergic agonists in untreated mild-to-moderately hypertensive patients (n = 22). Each patient underwent a single study. Forearm blood flow was recorded by strain gauge venous plethysmography; all drugs were infused into the brachial artery at systemically ineffective rates. Cumulative dose-response curves to intra-arterial methoxamine or B-HT 933 were obtained during saline or two different rates of verapamil infusion (0.9 and 3.1 micrograms/100 ml forearm tissue per min) which increased forearm blood flow dose-dependently without changing systemic blood pressure or heart rate. Either methoxamine or B-HT 933 decreased forearm blood flow during saline infusion, but their effect was blunted in a dose-dependent manner during verapamil. No evidence of preferential alpha 2-antagonism was present. At variance with animal data, calcium entry blockade by verapamil antagonizes either alpha 1- or alpha 2-mediated vasoconstriction in human forearm vessels
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
