1,721,561 research outputs found

    Bribie swamp energy balance for extreme changes in surface conditions

    No full text
    Turbulent heat fluxes for four periods of contrasting surface conditions: a dry surface with mature vegetation; a burnt, dry surface; a burnt, inundated surface; and a re-vegetated, inundated surface

    Figure 105 in A Revision of the Australian Funnel-web Spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae)

    No full text
    Figure 105. Collection records for Atrax flindersi (open circles), A. Comments. Burrows of adult and subadult spiders have aPublished as part of Gray, Michael R., 2010, A Revision of the Australian Funnel-web Spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae), pp. 285-392 in Records of the Australian Museum 62 (3) on page 386, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.62.2010.1556, http://zenodo.org/record/529801

    Figure 19 in A Revision of the Australian Funnel-web Spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae)

    No full text
    Figure 19. Collection records for Hadronyche cerberea.Published as part of Gray, Michael R., 2010, A Revision of the Australian Funnel-web Spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae), pp. 285-392 in Records of the Australian Museum 62 (3) on page 313, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.62.2010.1556, http://zenodo.org/record/529801

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    A revision of the Australian funnel-web spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae)

    No full text
    Gray, Michael R. (2010): A Revision of the Australian Funnel-web Spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae). Records of the Australian Museum 62 (3): 285-392, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.62.2010.1556, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.62.2010.155

    Figure 7. a–h, Phryganoporus nigrinus. a–d in The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae)

    No full text
    Figure 7. a–h, Phryganoporus nigrinus. a–d, Parkerville, WA, female: a,b, body, a,Published as part of <i>Gray, Michael R., 2002, The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae), pp. 275-292 in Records of the Australian Museum 54 (3)</i> on page 288, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.54.2002.1367, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10092512">http://zenodo.org/record/10092512</a&gt

    Figure 9. a–h, Phryganoporus melanopygus n in The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae)

    No full text
    Figure 9. a–h, Phryganoporus melanopygus n.sp. a–g, Windy Corner, WA. a–c, male palp: a, ventral; b, retrolateral;Published as part of <i>Gray, Michael R., 2002, The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae), pp. 275-292 in Records of the Australian Museum 54 (3)</i> on page 291, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.54.2002.1367, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10092512">http://zenodo.org/record/10092512</a&gt

    Figure 1. a,g, Phryganoporus candidus. b–f, h–j, Phryganoporus nigrinus. a,b in The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae)

    No full text
    Figure 1. a,g, Phryganoporus candidus. b–f, h–j, Phryganoporus nigrinus. a,b, dorsal tarsi—tarsal organ and trichobothria: a,Published as part of <i>Gray, Michael R., 2002, The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae), pp. 275-292 in Records of the Australian Museum 54 (3)</i> on page 277, DOI: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.54.2002.1367, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10092512">http://zenodo.org/record/10092512</a&gt
    corecore