1,720,970 research outputs found
Image Embeddings Extracted from CNNs Outperform Other Transfer Learning Approaches in Classification of Chest Radiographs
Full text linkTo identify the best transfer learning approach for the identification of the most frequent abnormalities on chest radiographs (CXRs), we used embeddings extracted from pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs). An explainable AI (XAI) model was applied to interpret black-box model predictions and assess its performance. Seven CNNs were trained on CheXpert. Three transfer learning approaches were thereafter applied to a local dataset. The classification results were ensembled using simple and entropy-weighted averaging. We applied Grad-CAM (an XAI model) to produce a saliency map. Grad-CAM maps were compared to manually extracted regions of interest, and the training time was recorded. The best transfer learning model was that which used image embeddings and random forest with simple averaging, with an average AUC of 0.856. Grad-CAM maps showed that the models focused on specific features of each CXR. CNNs pretrained on a large public dataset of medical images can be exploited as feature extractors for tasks of interest. The extracted image embeddings contain relevant information that can be used to train an additional classifier with satisfactory performance on an independent dataset, demonstrating it to be the optimal transfer learning strategy and overcoming the need for large private datasets, extensive computational resources, and long training times
Explainable domain transfer of distant supervised cancer subtyping model via imaging-based rules extraction
Full text linkImage texture analysis has for decades represented a promising opportunity for cancer assessment and disease progression evaluation, evolving in a discipline, i.e., radiomics. However, the road to a complete translation into clinical practice is still hampered by intrinsic limitations. As purely supervised classification models fail in devising robust imaging-based biomarkers for prognosis, cancer subtyping approaches would benefit from the employment of distant supervision, for instance exploiting survival/recurrence information. In this work, we assessed, tested, and validated the domain-generality of our previously proposed Distant Supervised Cancer Subtyping model on Hodgkin Lymphoma. We evaluate the model performance on two independent datasets coming from two hospitals, comparing and analyzing the results. Although successful and consistent, the comparison confirmed the instability of radiomics due to an across-center lack of reproducibility, leading to explainable results in one center and poor interpretability in the other. We thus propose a Random Forest-based Explainable Transfer Model for testing the domain-invariance of imaging biomarkers extracted from retrospective cancer subtyping. In doing so, we tested the predictive ability of cancer subtyping in a validation and perspective setting, which led to successful results and supported the domain-generality of the proposed approach. On the other hand, the extraction of decision rules enables to draw of risk factors and robust biomarkers to inform clinical decisions. This work shows the potentialities of the Distant Supervised Cancer Subtyping model to be further evaluated in larger multi-center datasets, to reliably translate radiomics into medical practice
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
