1,721,170 research outputs found

    Development of a core outcome set for paediatric achalasia:A joint ERNICA, ESPGHAN and EUPSA study protocol

    Get PDF
    Introduction:Achalasia is a rare disease in children. Studies investigating the efficacy of interventions and disease outcomes in paediatric achalasia are predominantly retrospective, consist of small cohorts and report heterogeneous outcomes. The variation in the use and definition of reported outcomes impedes meta-analysis, which is problematic in a rare paediatric condition. Similarly, there is a risk of under-reporting patient-relevant outcomes, such as quality of life. To overcome these issues, a minimum set of important and patient-relevant outcomes should be reported in all studies of paediatric achalasia. Core outcome sets (COS) are a standardised set of outcomes that can guide further research and facilitate data pooling and meta-analysis. The development of a COS in rare paediatric disease is essential, prior to conducting efficacy studies or creating a disease registry, to ensure that the most important outcomes are reported. Currently, no COS exists for children with achalasia. In this study, we aim to define a COS for paediatric achalasia for use in clinical research. Methods and analysis:This study will consist of three parts. The first will be a systematic review of the literature, evaluating the outcomes and outcome definitions reported in published clinical research studies investigating paediatric achalasia. Second, a three-stage Delphi consensus process will be undertaken to identify and prioritise outcomes. This process will involve healthcare professionals, patients and parent representatives. Third, a consensus meeting will be held, during which the final COS will be defined. Dissemination: The results of this study will be disseminated to stakeholders via the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies, European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, European Paediatric Surgeons' Association, and patient groups. The COS will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and uploaded to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative website. Trial registration number: The study was pre-registered with the COMET initiative in July 2024 (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2568). The systematic review component of the study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024509855).</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Is it prudent to add n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids to paediatric enteral tube feeding?

    No full text
    Nutritional support, as complete enteral tube feeding, is needed by many paediatric patients and must provide sufficient nutrients for normal growth and development. Enteral feeds contain the parent essential fatty acids, linoleic acid and ?-linolenic acid, but often do not contain n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Available data suggest that biosynthesis of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from ?-linolenic acid is low in humans and varies between individuals. Long-term enteral feeding with formulae devoid of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid may result in low levels in plasma and tissues, potentially affecting immune and neurological function. Currently there is insufficient evidence to define the quantitative eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid requirements for healthy children, or those with various disease states. Nevertheless, it appears prudent to supply children on long-term enteral nutrition with a dietary source of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. A reasonable approach would be to provide amounts matching intakes of healthy children complying with the advice to consume 1-2 portions of oily fish per week. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of different amounts of eicosapentaenoic acid and/or docosahexaenoic acid in enteral nutrition on polyunsaturated fatty acid status and the functional and clinical consequences in children

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore