1,721,103 research outputs found
Comment on the Editorial „The intensity-capacity concept – How far is it possible to predict intensity values with capacity parameters” (R. Horn & M. Kutilek, 2009, Soil & Tillage Research 103, 1-3)
No full textThe role of lysimeters in the development of our understanding of soil water und nutrient dynamics in ecosystems
No full textThe role of lysimeters in the development of our understanding of soil water und nutrient dynamics in ecosystems
No full textComment on the Editorial „The intensity-capacity concept – How far is it possible to predict intensity values with capacity parameters” (R. Horn & M. Kutilek, 2009, Soil & Tillage Research 103, 1-3)
No full text
Letter to the Editor. Comment on “Effects of agricultural machinery with high-axle load on soil properties of normally managed fields” (Autors L. Schäfer-Landefeld, R. Brandhuber, S. Fenner, H.-J. Koch & N. Stockfisch. Soil and Tillage Research 75, 2004, 75-86)
No full textLetter to the Editor. Comment on “Effects of agricultural machinery with high-axle load on soil properties of normally managed fields” (Autors L. Schäfer-Landefeld, R. Brandhuber, S. Fenner, H.-J. Koch & N. Stockfisch. Soil and Tillage Research 75, 2004, 75-86)
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
