1,721,389 research outputs found
Quadrature methods for Bayesian optimal design of experiments with nonnormal prior distributions
Full text linkMany optimal experimental designs depend on one or more unknown model parameters. In such cases, it is common to use Bayesian optimal design procedures to seek designs that perform well over an entire prior distribution of the unknown model parameter(s). Generally, Bayesian optimal design procedures are viewed as computationally intensive. This is because they require numerical integration techniques to approximate the Bayesian optimality criterion at hand. The most common numerical integration technique involves pseudo Monte Carlo draws from the prior distribution(s). For a good approximation of the Bayesian optimality criterion, a large number of pseudo Monte Carlo draws is required. This results in long computation times. As an alternative to the pseudo Monte Carlo approach, we propose using computationally efficient Gaussian quadrature techniques. Since, for normal prior distributions, suitable quadrature techniques have already been used in the context of optimal experimental design, we focus on quadrature techniques for nonnormal prior distributions. Such prior distributions are appropriate for variance components, correlation coefficients, and any other parameters that are strictly positive or have upper and lower bounds. In this article, we demonstrate the added value of the quadrature techniques we advocate by means of the Bayesian D-optimality criterion in the context of split-plot experiments, but we want to stress that the techniques can be applied to other optimality criteria and other types of experimental designs as well. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.</p
Analysis of data from non-orthogonal multistratum designs in industrial experiments
No full textSplit-plot and other multistratum structures are widely used in factorial and response surface experiments. Residual maximum likelihood (REML) and generalized least squares (GLS) estimation is seen as the state of the art method of data analysis for non-orthogonal designs. We analyse data from an experiment that was run to study the effects of five process factors on the drying rate for freeze-dried coffee and find that the main plot variance component is estimated to be 0. We show that this is a typical property of REML–GLS estimation in non-orthogonal split-plot designs with few main plots which is highly undesirable and can give misleading conclusions. Instead, we recommend a Bayesian analysis, using an informative prior distribution for the main plot variance component and implement this by using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. Paradoxically, the Bayesian analysis is less dependent on prior assumptions than the REML–GLS analysis. Bayesian analyses of the coffee freeze-drying data give more realistic conclusions than REML–GLS analysis, providing support for our recommendation.<br/
A general strategy for analyzing data from split-plot and multistratum experimental designs
No full textIncreasingly, industrial experiments use multistratum designs, such as split-plot and strip-plot designs. Often, these experiments span more than one processing stage. The challenge is to identify an appropriate multistratum design, along with an appropriate statistical model. In this article, we introduce Hasse diagrams in the response surface context as a tool to visualize the unit structure of the experimental design, the randomization and sampling approaches used, the stratum in which each experimental factor is applied, and the degrees of freedom available in each stratum to estimate main effects, interactions, and variance components. We illustrate their use on several responses measured in a large study of the adhesion properties of coatings to polypropylene. We discuss quantitative, binary, and ordered categorical responses, for designs ranging from a simple split-plot to a strip-plot that involves repeated measurements of the response. The datasets discussed in this article are available online as supplementary materials, along with sample SAS programs
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The importance of attribute interactions in conjoint choice design and modeling.
Full text linkWithin the context of choice experimental designs, most authors have proposed designs for the multinomial logit model under the assumption that only the main effects matter. Very little attention has been paid to designs for the attribute interaction models. In this paper, we present Bayesian D-optimal interaction-effects designs for the multinomial logit models and compare their predictive performances with those of main-effects designs. We show that in situations where a researcher is not sure whether or not the attribute interaction effects are present, incorporating interaction effects into both design stage and model estimation stage is most robust against misspecification of the underlying model for making precise predictions.Bayesian; Choice; Interaction effects; Experimental design; Predictions; Multinomial logit;
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
