1,720,988 research outputs found
Involvement in bottom-up energy transitions:the role of local and contextual embeddedness
Many bottom-up community energy initiatives (CEIs) have been initiated in recent years, aiming to promote a sustainable energy transition. CEIs operate in local communities and entail collaboration towards achieving a common community goal. Setting up a successful CEI requires the involvement of a sufficient number of community members. This raises the question of why people become involved in these initiatives. For this thesis, data was collected in various communities in the Netherlands, scrutinizing the role the local community and the social interactions within it play for involvement in CEIs. Results show that the specific expectation regarding fellow community members’ participation, connections to initiators and involvement in the community were found to be related to involvement in a CEI. These findings suggest that initiative involvement is inherently social and people are not only motivated to become involved in a CEI because of its pro-environmental cause, but are (additionally) motivated by the local social context of the community.Furthermore, there is an international trend to encourage the shared ownership of renewable energy projects between communities and commercial developers based on the assumption that they can form effective partnerships and can negotiate fair outcomes, potentially speeding up the energy transition. Yet, it remains unclear how such arrangements are formed in practice. Based on in-depth interviews with UK stakeholders from various backgrounds, this dissertation provides insights into the formation of shared ownership arrangements and the role of trust and justice in shaping practice. Findings suggest that early efforts to make shared ownership work in practice in the UK have proved difficult, despite high levels of support in principle. A consistent finding is that shared ownership is undermined by a lack of trust, with negative expectations of the different parties involved of one another
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
