1,720,994 research outputs found
Master and Subject, or Inequality as Felicitous Opportunity: Gender Relations of the Nineteenth-Century Middle Class
No full textMaster and Subject, or Inequality as Felicitous Opportunity: Gender Relations of the Nineteenth-Century Middle Class
No full textDie Pädagogik der Erinnerungskultur aus pietistischer Quelle. Zur Stilisierung Heinrich Pestalozzis
No full textDas Herzogtum Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel und seine politische Position in (Nord-)Deutschland
No full textDas Herzogtum Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel und seine politische Position in (Nord-)Deutschland
No full textRevues germanophones
No full textGeschichte und Gesellschaft (Allemagne) Histoire contemporaine Mecking, Christine, « Chefin oder Mauerblümchen ? Frauen in der öffentlichen Verwaltung der Bundesrepublik », Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 31, 3, 2005, 465-493. Historische Anthropologie. Kultur – Gesellschaft – Alltag (Allemagne/Autriche/Suisse) Histoire moderne Gleixner, Ulrike, « Pietismus, Geschlecht und Selbstentwurf. Das "Wochenbuch" der Beate Hahn, verh. Paulus (1778–1842) », Historische Anthropologie, 10, 1, 2002, 76-100. ..
Pietismus und Bürgertum eine historische Anthropologie der Frömmigkeit ; Württemberg 17. - 19. Jahrhundert
No full textOn the cultural dimension of religion, with respect to the development of subjectivity, practical piety and daily living, as expressed in the lives of women, men and children belonging to the academically educated and pietistically oriented middle classes, living in Württemberg, Germany, in the 17th-19th centuries. This original, homegrown culture is characterized, so the author, by the "Spritualization of the Everyday.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
