86,911 research outputs found
Correction to: Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry
No full textA technical error led to incorrect rendering of the author group in this article. The correct authorship is as follows: Luca Aldrighetti, Francesca Ratti, Umberto Cillo, Alessandro Ferrero, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Alfredo Guglielmi, Felice Giuliante, Fulvio Calise on behalf of the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I GO MILS) The collaborators are: Raffaele Dalla Valle, AOU Parma, Parma; Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano; Elio Jovine, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna; Luciano Gregorio De Carlis, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano; Ugo Boggi, AOU Pisana, Pisa; Salvatore Gruttadauria, ISMETT, Palermo; Fabrizio Di Benedetto, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena; Paolo Reggiani, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano; Stefano Berti, Ospedale Civile S.Andrea, La Spezia; Graziano Ceccarelli, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo; Leonardo Vincenti, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari; Giulio Belli, Ospedale SM Loreto Nuovo, Napoli; Guido Torzilli, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano; Fausto Zamboni, Ospedale Brotzu, Cagliari; Andrea Coratti, AOU Careggi, Firenze; Pietro Mezzatesta, Casa di Cura La Maddalena, Palermo; Roberto Santambrogio, AO San Paolo, Milano; Giuseppe Navarra, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina; Antonio Giuliani, AO R.N. Cardarelli, Napoli; Antonio Daniele Pinna, Policlinico Sant’Orsola Malpighi, Bologna; Amilcare Parisi, AO Santa Maria di Terni, Terni; Michele Colledan, AO Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo; Abdallah Slim, AO Desio e Vimercate, Vimercate; Adelmo Antonucci, Policlinico di Monza, Monza; Gian Luca Grazi, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Roma; Antonio Frena, Ospedale Centrale, Bolzano; Giovanni Sgroi, AO Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio; Alberto Brolese, Ospedale S.Chiara, Trento; Luca Morelli, AOU Pisana, Pisa; Antonio Floridi, AO Ospedale Maggiore, Crema; Alberto Patriti, Ospedale San Matteo degli Infermi, Spoleto; Luigi Veneroni, Ospedale Infermi AUSL Romagna, Rimini; Giorgio Ercolani, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Forlì; Luigi Boni, AOU Fondazione Macchi, Varese; Pietro Maida, Ospedale Villa Betania, Napoli; Guido Griseri, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona; Andrea Percivale, Ospedale Santa Corona, Pietraligure; Marco Filauro, AO Galliera, Genova; Silvio Guerriero, Ospedale San Martino, Belluno; Giuseppe Tisone, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma; Raffaele Romito, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara; Umberto Tedeschi, AOU Integrata Verona, Verona; Giuseppe Zimmitti, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia
Intraoperative liver ultrasound still affects surgical strategy for patients with colorectal metastases in the modern era
No full textIntraoperative liver ultrasound still affects surgical strategy for patients with colorectal metastases in the modern era.
Ferrero A1, Langella S, Giuliante F, Viganò L, Vellone M, Zimmitti G, Ardito F, Nuzzo G, Capussotti L.
Author information1Department of Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy, [email protected].
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the role of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in intrahepatic staging and the impact on surgical strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
METHODS: The study included 515 patients who had undergone liver resection for CRLM at two tertiary care referral centers. Data from a prospectively collected database were retrospectively analysed. Early intrahepatic recurrence was assessed at 3 and 6 months after resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS. Performance of imaging modalities was compared by analysis of studies on individual patients.
RESULTS: A total of 1,370 liver metastases were detected preoperatively with a median of 3 imaging modalities. MRI and PET were performed in 51 and 42 % of the patients, respectively. Median number of days between last imaging and surgery was 18. Contrast-enhanced IOUS was performed in 136 patients (26.4 %). Intraoperatively, 293 new nodules were found in 132 patients: on histology 280 were CRLM (17.6 %). Surgical strategy was changed in 140 patients (27.2 %). On multivariate analysis synchronous and bilobar metastases ≥ 3 in number, BMI ≥ 30, and time between last imaging and surgery longer than 18 days resulted in predictive factors indicating new nodules detected by IOUS. Early intrahepatic recurrences were 3.7 and 7.9 % at 3 and 6 months. Performance of CT, MRI, FDG-PET, and intraoperative staging was compared: sensitivity was 63.6, 68.8, 53.6, and 92 % and specificity was 91, 92.3, 95.8, and 97.8 %, respectively
CONCLUSIONS: The use of IOUS continues to be mandatory for correct staging of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection
ASO Author Reflections: The Liver-First Approach: A New Standard for Patients with Multiple Bilobar Colorectal Metastases?
No full textThe best surgical strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is a matter of endless debate. Technical and oncological issues must be considered but have often been confounded. In 2006, Mentha et al.1 proposed an innovative and convincing oncosurgical approach, whereby they reversed the strategy, focusing attention on the prognostically most relevant target, i.e. the liver. Even if appealing, the liver-first approach struggled to find its role and failed to demonstrate a benefit, except for the inclusion of chemoradiotherapy in the treatment schedule of patients with locally advanced rectal tumors. The proposers themselves reported non-inferiority (and not superiority) of the reverse strategy in comparison with the standard primary-first approach.2 A recent network meta-analysis ranked the liver-first approach as the best treatment option for its relative efficacy based on 5-year overall survival outcomes,3 but the evidence is too weak to impact current clinical practice
Anatomical liver resection of segment 4a en bloc with the caudate lobe
No full textAnatomical segmentectomy is the complete resection of an area supplied by a segmental portal branch. Among segmentectomies, isolated segmentectomy 4 is a technically demanding procedure because there are two transection planes: on the left side along the umbilical fissure and, on the right side, along the middle hepatic vein. Although there are several reports on anatomic segmentectomies, only few regard the anatomic segmentectomy 4a. We report here the case of a 60-year-old man who underwent anatomical segmentectomy 4a en bloc with the caudate lobe to resect a colorectal liver metastasis located in segment 4a and involving the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe. This type of procedure was planned in order to maximize the postoperative functional hepatic reserve, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure and ultimately allowing the possibility for future repeat hepatectomy in case of recurrence. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:665-667. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Primary Hepatic Angiosarcoma
No full textPrimary hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare entity, representing only 4%
of all the angiosarcomas of different origins1 and less than 1% of all
hepatic malignancies.2
Accurate diagnosis of this tumour is difficult, especially if the
patient has no history of exposure to specific carcinogens including
thorotrast, arsenicals and vinyl chloride monomer.3
Angiosarcoma, a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, is an aggressive
malignant disease deriving from endothelium, lymphatics or blood
vessels. Some of the more common hepatic sarcomas are angiosarcoma,
embryonal sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma,
fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma.2
The survival of hepatic angiosarcoma is very poor, which is attributable
to its rapid progress, high recurrence rate and resistant to
traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy.4 The survival of patients
with liver angiosarcoma is very poor with median survival of 6
months without treatment; after treatment, only 3% of patients were
reported to live longer than 2 year
Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
No full textBackground & Aims: Lymph-nodal status is an important predictor of survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), but the need to perform lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) iCCA is still under debate. The aim of this study was to determine whether adequate lymphadenectomy improves long-term outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection for cN0 iCCA. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients who underwent radical liver resection for cN0 iCCA at five tertiary referral centers. A propensity score based on preoperative data was calculated and used to generate stabilized inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW). Overall and recurrence-free survival of patients undergoing adequate (≥6 retrieved lymph nodes) vs. inadequate lymphadenectomy were compared. Interactions between adequacy of lymphadenectomy and clinical variables of interest were explored through Cox IPTW regression. Results: The study includes 706 patients who underwent curative surgery for cN0 iCCA. Four-hundred and seventeen (59.1%) received adequate lymphadenectomy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 18-77), median overall survival was 39 months (IQR 23-109) and median recurrence-free survival was 23 months (IQR 8-74). After stratification according to nodal status at final pathology, node-positive patients had longer overall survival (28 vs. 23 months; hazard ratio 1.82; 95% CI 1.14-2.90; p = 0.023) and disease-free survival (13 vs. 9 months; hazard ratio 1.35; 95% CI 1.14-1.59; p = 0.008) after adequate lymphadenectomy. Adequate lymphadenectomy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients without chronic liver disease, and in patients with less-advanced tumors (solitary tumors, tumor size <5 cm, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <200 U/ml). Conclusions: Adequate lymphadenectomy provided better survival outcomes for patients with cN0 iCCA who were found to be node-positive at pathology, supporting the routine use of adequate lymphadenectomy for cN0 iCCA. Impact and implications: Lymphadenectomy is essential for the surgical staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). While its role in patients with preoperative suspicion of nodal metastases is implicit, the impact of lymphadenectomy on survival of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) disease is still under debate. In this large retrospective study on patients who underwent surgical resection for cN0 iCCA, we show that adequate lymphadenectomy (i.e. retrieving ≥6 lymph nodes) significantly improves survival and lowers the risk of tumor recurrence. Lymphadenectomy during surgical resection of iCCA is actually underperformed by the surgical community, resulting in inadequate staging and possibly worse long-term outcomes. The results of this study should empower surgeons and clinicians to push for adequate lymphadenectomy even for cN0 iCCA. Since patients with no chronic liver disease and with less-advanced tumors receive a significant benefit from lymphadenectomy, our results might guide decision making in patients at high-risk of postoperative complications
Letter to the Editor: EUS-FNA for Lymph Nodes Staging in Cholangiocarcinoma: Should It Become Standard of Care?
No full textNo abstract availabl
- …
