1,720,962 research outputs found

    Assessment of treatment effects on cataplexy in peaditaric NT1 throught standadized video recording procedure

    No full text
    Objectives: Cataplexy is the pathognomonic symptom of type 1 narcolepsy (NT1), however current criteria do not require its objective assessment. The aim of this study is to extend the reliability of our standardized video recording procedure for cataplexy assessment to measure response to treatment. Methods: Twenty NT1 children and adolescent were evaluated at baseline and after at least three months of stable treatment with Sodium Oxybate or Pitolisant. Children underwent a standardized video recording procedure consisting of watching funny movies, with the aim of evoking cataplexy. Immediately after the test, an expert sleep technician reviewed the whole video recording and systematically evaluated the occurrence (on a 4-point Likert scale) of head drops, trunk falls, ptosis, and mouth opening separately in the baseline and the under emotional stimulation conditions. Tests results in the two conditions were compared within subjects. Results: Patients (16 males and 4 females) had NT1 onset at age 9.5 ± 3.06 and were studied at a mean age of 11.7 ± 2.6 at baseline and 13.4 ± 2.5 at follow-up. Our standardized video recording procedure objectively documented a significant reduction of cataplexy features (head drops, ptosis, and mouth openings) at follow-up compared to baseline assessment. Conclusions: Our results show that a standardized video recording procedure is able to successfully track of anticataplectic therapies effects in paediatric NT1 patients. This simple and quickly use procedure have the potential to be a reliable tool to objectively assess cataplexy severity across the establishment of pharmacological therapies. Further studies are needed to extend the population and analyze the effect of different treatment strategies alone and in combination

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore