1,721,026 research outputs found
Benthic foraminifera as a key to delta evolution: A case study from the late Holocene succession of the Po River Delta
ABSTRACT: Benthic foraminifera from stratigraphically expanded, late Quaternary prodelta successions of the Po Delta plain reveal small-scale paleoenvironmental variations within lithologically homogeneous deposits formed under conditions of rapid sedimentation (ca. 6 cm/yr). A detailed paleoenvironmental reconstruction was obtained comparing benthic foraminifera with shallow-water assemblages from the modern Po Delta. The integration with sediment geochemistry and radiocarbon dates was also tested to detect short time-scale delta dynamics controlled by autogenic factors. Core 7 records the development of an inner-shelf environment (interval A), replaced by a prodelta with strong fluvial influence, shown by the sharp increase in Ammonia tepida and Ammonia parkinsoniana (interval B). These taxa are replaced by Aubignyna perlucida (interval C) which indicates a major mouth shift (Ficarolo avulsion). Subsequent abrupt increases in A. tepida and A. parkinsoniana document a step-like progradation of the Po di Goro delta lobe (intervals D and E). In the seaward Core 1, possible minor mouth shifts are recorded by a sharp increase in A. tepida and A. parkinsoniana, paralleled by Cr/Al2O3 depletion. The upper portion of both prodelta successions includes stacked flood layers formed near the river mouth, as indicated by scarce A. tepida and A. parkinsoniana
Potential and limits of benthic foraminiferal ecological indices in paleoenvironmental reconstructions: a case from a Holocene succession of the Po Delta, Italy
Classical (paleo-)ecological indices extracted from benthic foraminiferal assemblages are commonly applied to determine
past environmental conditions.We tested the efficiency of selected indices (including wall type proportion, epifaunal/infaunal ratio
and pooled diversity indices) on benthic foraminifera from a Holocene shallow marine succession of the Po Delta, in order to
evaluate their advantages, limits and differences. The paleoenvironmental record was determined integrating species composition of assemblages.
All indices clearly discriminated between low and high riverine influence, even though the boundary at three different core depths
revealed their different sensitivity to the faunal response under changing environmental conditions in terms of organic matter and sediment
supply. Specifically, the lowest boundary was highlighted by wall structural types and epifaunal/infaunal ratio that were able to
track the first inputs of organic matter provided by the prograding Po River mouths. Upward, low sand concentration and moderate
foraminiferal abundance (expressed as Total Foraminiferal Number) indicated significant supplies of fine-grained sediments within a
prodelta paleoenvironment. Lastly, diversity indices revealed stressful prodelta conditions with remarkable low diversity and high dominance
values.
We show that high paleoenvironmental resolution can be obtained through the integration of faunal indices, species composition
and sediment grain size within deltaic successions, where many indices should be considered to comprehensively understand the onset
of riverine influenced conditions
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
