200 research outputs found
The safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed venom extract of Vespula spp. An open, retrospective study.
No full textBACKGROUND:
specific immunotherapy for Hymenoptera Venom (VIT) is considered a life-saving treatment in insect sting allergy. A few studies with depot VIT have been published, but they are mainly focussed on patients sensitized to Apis.
METHODS:
this retrospective study was designed to evaluate both efficacy and safety of depot VIT for Vespula. Thirty-six patients (age range 6-73 years) with a history of systemic reactions (grade III to IV according to Mueller) after a Vespula sting, and specific sera IgE RAST to Vespula at least class 2, were administered a depot preparation of venom reaching 50 microgram as monthly maintenance dose. After the first year the maintenance dose was administered every other month. Thirty-three patients were treated for a minimum of 5 years. Reactions to any new field sting of the relevant insect were recorded during the treatment and for 6 to 24 months after its interruption.
RESULTS:
the treatment showed an excellent tolerance, with only a few local side effects. Thirteen patients (11 Grade IV according to Mueller before VIT) under treatment showed only local reactions after each field sting (18 field stings in total) by the relevant insect. Four patients (3 Grade IV according to Mueller before VIT) had a total of 6 field stings after the interruption of the 5-year treatment, with only local reactions.
CONCLUSIONS:
according to our results, and in agreement with previous published studies, VIT for Vespula spp. with depot extracts has an excellent tolerance and is clinically effective
Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell-Based Vaccines?
No full textDevitalized tumor cells either autologous or allogeneic have been used as anti-cancer vaccines with the purpose of facilitating the induction of an immune response able to destroy growing tumor cells since the identification of tumor antigens was deemed not to be necessary, particularly in the autologous system. Such vaccines were tested first in animal models and then in the clinics as unmodified tumor cells or after insertion of genes coding for factors known to increase the immune response against tumors. These vaccines were usually given by subcutaneous injections along with different immunological adjuvants. Such immunization approaches were found to be effective in mice when carried out in a tumor preventive setting but significantly less in the therapeutic context, that is, in the presence of an established tumor. By analyzing several clinical trials of vaccination using either autologous or allogeneic unmodified and gene-modified tumor cells published in the last 10 to 15 years, we conclude for a lack of sufficient evidence for efficacy of this strategy in inducing both a strong immune response and a therapeutic response. A potential variant of this strategy is the direct intratumoral injection of immunostimulatory genes delivered by vectors in vivo. But even this approach failed to provide a statistically significant clinical benefit for the cancer patients.We also point out the inherent drawbacks of the tumor cell-based vaccine strategy that include (a) a limited frequency by which human tumor lines can be obtained from clinical samples, (b) the low number of available cells for vaccination, (c) the release of immune-suppressive factors by tumor cells, and (d) the cost and time necessary for standardization and collecting/expanding a number of cells according to the approved regulatory requirements. Thus, taking into consideration the new developments in cancer vaccines, we believe that tumor cell-based vaccines should be dismissed as anti-cancer vaccines unless a clear benefit could be demonstrated by the few ongoing trials of combination with new immunomodulating reagents (eg, anti-CTLA4, PD-1, chemotherapy)
Murine granulocytes control human tumor growth in SCID mice
No full textSevere combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice generally do not reject allogeneic or xenogeneic organ grafts and represent a unique model for investigating in vivo the behaviour of both normal and neoplastic human cells. However, cells from human primary tumors often do not grow in SCID mice. We have previously shown that the major reaction of SCID mice to the engraftment of human peripheral blood leukocytes is a massive granulocyte recruitment into the site of transplantation. In this study, we have investigated the role of murine granulocytes in the control of human tumor cell growth in SCID mice. We report here that murine granulocytes infiltrate and delimit the human tumor mass and that treatment of SCID mice with anti-murine granulocyte antibody markedly improves the growth of human tumor cell lines of different origin through suppression of the host granulocyte reaction. This finding provides a new tool for improving the human tumor take in SCID mice, thus opening new perspectives for a practical in vivo preclinical test of anti-tumor strategies. Moreover, this study, even with the limits of the known natural reaction against xenotransplants, further supports the importance of granulocytes in the control of tumor take and growth. Int. J. Cancer 87:569-573, 2000. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Sublingual tryptase and ECP in children treated with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT): safety and immunologic implications.
No full textClinical and immunologic effects of a rush sublingual immunotherapy to Parietaria species: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
No full textMinimal persistent inflammation is present at mucosal level in asymptomatic rhinitic patients with allergy due to mites
No full textSublingual immunotherapy abrogates seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with Parietaria-induced respiratory allergy: a randomized controlled trial.
No full textPost-marketing surveillance study on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric patients.
No full textFollow-Up of Melanoma: A Survey of Italian Hospitals
No full textFollow-up is managed internally in 94% of centers and is programmed according to international guidelines in 52% of
high-volume hospitals (>25 melanoma diagnoses per year); the remainder use internal guidelines; fewer low-volume centers ( ≤ 25 diagnoses per year) have internal guidelines (25%, p = 0.001). Instrumental examinations for stage III and IV disease are similar, while the examination interval changes from 3/4 months for stage III to 2/3 months for stage IV, and use of PET/CT increases from 44 to 54%. Overall, thoracic and abdominal CT is used most for follow-up in stage III (83%), while bone scintigraphy is used more commonly in low-volume centers (41 vs. 19%, p = 0.003), despite similar use of PET/CT (48 vs. 41%). Brain CT or MRI is more common in high-volume centers (63 vs. 39%, p > 0.0001), as is echography of draining lymph nodes (71 vs. 52%, p = 0.01). Hepatic/abdominal echography and thoracic radiography are used in about 50% of centers, regardless of type. In stage IV, use of bone scintigraphy is similar among groups (ca. 40%); brain CT/NMR use increases from 51 to 64% and is more common in high-volume centers (p = 0.03). Lymph node echography is more common in high-volume centers (56 vs. 39%, p = 0.03)
- …
