1,721,026 research outputs found

    Congenital granular cell epulis of newborn: importance of prenatal diagnosis

    Full text link
    Congenital granular cell epulis is a rare benign lesion usually arising as single mass from the alveolar ridge of maxillary bone of female newborns, composed of polygonal granular cells that typically stain negative for S-100, in contrast to the adult counterpart. Larger lesions can disturb breathing and breast-feeding, requiring surgery. Prenatal diagnosis is achieved in few cases, even if this would be important for best management of delivery and therapy. Here we present a case of multiple CGCE in a female newborn discovered at birth, together with a brief review of pathogenesis, differential diagnoses and treatment implications of early diagnosis

    Ependymoma with diffuse signet-ring features: report of a case and review of the literature

    No full text
    Signet-ring cell ependymoma is a rare variant of ependymoma with only seven cases described in literature. Biological behavior and prognosis of this entity are not well-known until now. We present a case of a 49-year-old female with a history of headache and gait instability. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an upper cervical tumor with cystic component and mural nodule. The patient underwent surgery. Microscopically some cells displayed an eccentric nucleus compressed to the periphery by vacuolated cytoplasm. Perivascular pseudorosettes and ependymal rosettes were seen only focally. The cells were positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein and epithelial membrane antigen. The diagnosis was ependymoma with diffuse signet-ring features, grade II according to the World Health Organization. It may be difficult to diagnose this unusual variant of ependymoma especially on small biopsies or frozen sections. A complete examination of the specimen is recommended with immunohistochemical confirmation to rule out potential morphologic mimics, such as metastatic adenocarcinomas and gliomas in the differential diagnosis

    Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of the urinary bladder expressing GATA 3

    No full text
    Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the urinary bladder are uncommon tumors represented by small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and by fewer cases of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Less than 30 examples of this latter entity have been published so far and consisted of clinically indolent lesions mainly located in the bladder neck arranged in a pseudo-glandular architecture often associated with reactive urothelial changes like cystitis cystica/glandularis. Due to their infrequency, pathologists may face difficulty to recognize this proliferation considering it as part of cystitis cystica/glandularis or misinterpreting it as nested urothelial carcinoma, paraganglioma, or secondary bladder involvement by prostatic adenocarcinoma. Herein the case of a 51-year-old female diagnosed with a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of the bladder immunohistochemically expressing GATA3 is reported, pointing out either the pitfall in the differential diagnosis with cystitis cystica/glandularis, nested urothelial carcinoma, and paraganglioma or its usefulness in the differential diagnosis with prostatic adenocarcinoma

    Cystic dilation of the ventriculus terminalis.

    No full text
    Object The ventriculus terminalis, an embryological remnant consisting of the ependymal-lined space of the conus medullaris, can occasionally become symptomatic after cystic dilation. In the existing literature, consisting of 32 cases, the preferred type of management (conservative vs surgical) is still debated. The object of this study was to report the surgical results in a consecutive series of 10 adult patients with cystic dilation of the ventriculus terminalis (CDVT), to match them with data retrieved from the relevant literature, and specifically to validate a new recent clinical classification. Methods The authors reported 13 new cases of CDVT treated in the Department of Neurosurgery at University Hospital in Verona, Italy. Treatment modalities and clinical and radiological outcomes, both early and at follow-up, were analyzed and compared with a preoperative classification of clinical presentation, as established by de Moura Batista and colleagues (2008). Results Surgical treatment seemed to guarantee the resolution of CDVT. Dorsolumbar laminotomy, myelotomy, and cystic drainage were performed in 10 patients. Patients with Type I symptoms (nonspecific complaints) often presented with comorbidities (herniated disc or facet hypertrophy) confusing their clinical status. The surgical treatment of patients with Type I symptoms promoted good results only if the diagnosis of CDVT was definitive and symptoms had rapidly evolved. In patients with Type II (focal neurological deficits) and III (sphincter disturbances) symptoms, surgical treatment sustained improvement even at the late follow-up. Conclusions While confirming the usefulness of de Moura Batista and colleagues' classification in its impact on prognosis, the authors propose a revision of the classification with subgroups Type Ia (nonspecific symptoms without clear relation to CDVT), which is best treated conservatively, and Type Ib (rapid onset and invalidating unspecific complaints without comorbidities), which may benefit from surgical evacuation

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore