1,721,152 research outputs found
Envelope addressed to Professor Georg Hoffmann from Theodor Nöldeke, with message
Box 36, Folder 4 Ink on paper. Envelope addressed to Professor Georg Hoffmann, Schwanenweg, Kiel (Germany). A stamp reading "Th. Nöldeke, Strassburg," suggests that the letter or envelope was sent by the famous German orientalist Theodor Nöldeke, who had been professor at Kiel until 1872, when he was appointed chair of Oriental languages at Strasbourg. Undeciphered text on back may be correspondence. Probably dates to c. 1876-7. Title and identification based on text from document. German address written on front in black ink: "Herrn Professor Dr. Georg Hoffmann; Kiel (Holstein) Schwanenweg. Stamped on front in purple ink: "Th. Nöldeke, Strassburg.
Publication notice, sent to Professor Georg Hoffmann from Schwers'sche Buchhandlung, Kiel, dated May 31, 1877
Box 36, Folder 4 Ink on paper. Letter addressed to Professor Georg Hoffmann (d. 1945), from Schwers'sche Buchhandlung (a book store) in Kiel, Germany. The letter is advertising the recent publication of two books: Edward Maitland, England and Islam, or, the Counsel of Caiaphas (London: Tinsley Brothers, 1877); and Arthur Arnold, Through Persia by Caravan (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1877). This letter is part of a group of documents containing correspondence between Georg Hoffmann and various other scholars and government officials. Title and identification based on text from document. Kiel, den 31 Mai, 1877; Herrn Professor Dr. Hoffmann, Soeben erschien und wird vom Verleger nur auf feste Bestellung geliefert: Edward Maitland, England and Islam, or the counsel of Caiaphas, 1 vol. 8; Arthur Arnold, Through Persia by Caravan, 2 vols. 8.... Zu geneigten Aufträgen empfiehlt sich die Schwers'sche Buchhandlung Holstenstrasse 9
Letter, sent from Theodor Nöldecke to Professor Georg Hoffmann, with notes in unidentified medieval Arabic geographic text, dated January 20, 1877
Box 36, Folder 4 Ink on paper. Postcard addressed to Professor Georg Hoffmann of Kiel. The postmark reads 20 January 1877 from Strassburg, indicating that the sender was probably Theodor Nöldecke who was a professor at Strassburg and was in touch with Hoffmann about Arabic geographic literature. Notes on back are not transcribed. Title and identification based on text from document
Envelope addressed to Professor Georg Hoffmann from R. Gottheil, with message to Ferdinand Wüstenfeld
Box 36, Folder 4 Envelope addressed to Professor Dr. Georg Hoffmann of Kiel, Germany, from R. Gottheil (Richard James Horatio Gottheil, d. 1936). The letter from New York is postmarked 13 November. A postmark from Kiel on the reverse is dated 23 November, 1891. The envelope includes a message written in black ink on the reverse from Hoffmann to Ferdinand Wüstenfeld (d. 1899). Title and identification based on text from document. Address written on front in black ink: "Professor Dr. Georg Hoffman; Kiel, Germany; From R. Gottheil." Postmark stamped on front in black ink: "New York Nov 13 330 PM." Postmark stamped on back in black ink: "Kiel 23.11.91 10-11 V." German address and message written on back in black ink: "Geheimrat Wüstenfeld, Weender Chaussee, Göttingen. [Message not transcribed].
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
