1,721,079 research outputs found

    Healthcare Activism, Marketization, and the Collective Good

    Full text link
    This chapter engages with three key dynamics of contemporary healthcare - digitalization, marketization and individualization. It draws on several theoretical frameworks to conceptualize the notion of collective good and to consider how healthcare activism may play into defining and defending the collective good when faced with the outlined societal, economic, and scientific dynamics. Presenting contemporary examples from the Covid-19 pandemic, the chapter argues that the way activists define and defend the collective good can only fully be understood by grasping how this good is shaped by other, often more dominant, stakeholders in healthcare: governmental institutions, professional experts, scientists, and private industry – the latter being a focal point of concern for this current volume.European Commission Horizon 2020Check for published version during checkdate report - AC2021-04-28 JG: PDF replaced at author's request2021-06-04 JG: embargo removed following documentation from author/publishe

    Healthcare Activism, Marketization, and the Collective Good

    Full text link
    This introductory chapter charts the book’s trajectory by engaging with three interlinked key dynamics of contemporary healthcare—marketization, digitalization, and individualization. It draws on several theoretical frameworks to conceptualize notions of the common, collective, or public good and to consider how healthcare activism may play into defining and defending the collective good when faced with the outlined societal, economic, and scientific dynamics. Presenting contemporary examples from the Covid-19 pandemic, the chapter argues that the way activists define and defend the collective good can only fully be understood by grasping how this good is shaped by other, often more dominant, stakeholders in healthcare: governmental institutions, professional experts, scientists, and private industry—the latter being a focal point of concern for this current volume.European Commission Horizon 202

    The sales function in the 21st century: where are we and where do we go from here?

    No full text
    Partendo da un'analisi dello stato dell'arte delle consocenze sul personal selling e sales management l'articolo individua le priorità di ricerca su questi temi sulla base delle percezioni di un panel di accademici in 12 paesi europei in merito a importanza (teorica e manageriale) e livello di conoscenza attuale (in ambito sia scientifico che manageriale) relativamente a 18 argomenti legati alle vendite

    Tinkering in Markets for Collective Goods: Experiments, Exceptionalities and the Case of HIV Medications

    No full text
    This chapter proposes that the manifold tinkering and experimenting that happens in and around markets and their infrastructures over time holds valuable lessons for the future design of these markets. More specifically, we argue that a fair and equitable market design can only be achieved if the legal and political mechanisms that have shaped that particular market over time are understood, and misfires and repair attempts of the past are acknowledged and reflected upon. Using a historical perspective, this chapter maps the decades-long tinkering behind the HIV medications market, a market that has historically misfired in and through its very blueprint, which is strongly framed by its legal infrastructures. To examine the experiments in this particular market to create a collective good, we trace the relevant laws, property rights provisions and amendments, market governance practices, and civil society actions over the past forty years. Reflecting on the many misfires of this market and the equally numerous attempts to repair it, our study considers market tinkering as a reaction to overflows as an iterative, experimental process, but one that is likely to never fully transcend the market’s formative blueprint. Ending on an optimistic note, though, we also think through ways of radically redesigning the market for essential medicines

    Introduction:the multiple pasts, presents and futures of markets and market studies

    No full text
    The Market Studies discipline represents an effort to understand and unscramble the entangled knot of practices, agents, devices and infrastructures that constitute markets. Over the past two decades it has become an interdisciplinary field, with scholars from sociology, marketing, management, organization studies, economics, anthropology, geography and design – an epistemic community (Knorr Cetina 1999) studying the emergence, transformation and innovation of markets (Araujo, Finch and Kjellberg 2010; Kjellberg and Helgesson 2006, 2007). The Market Studies field understands markets as socio-material, technical, political and economic forms of organizing collectives of distributed, heterogeneous sets of expertise – not only of exchange but also of society (Çalışkan and Callon 2009; Callon 1998)

    Heroes, Villains, and Victims : Tracing Breast Cancer Activist Movements

    Full text link
    This chapter explores the construction of dramaturgic characters in social movement narratives surrounding breast cancer. It contributes to developing a better understanding of the role of plotting and characterization in these social movement narratives by highlighting three primary functions. First, the authors elaborate on the functions of the plotting of the central characters of a social movement narrative and their emotional appeal, in contributing to mobilizing collective action as well as operating a disciplining tool for the biological citizen. Second, they shed light on the effects of the simplification versus complexification of the characterization of the villain on mobilizing the audience’s emotions. Finally, they discuss the role of the individualization and collectivization dynamics in the various social movement narratives in stabilizing and/or destabilizing certain political realities

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
    corecore