1,720,971 research outputs found
Unveiling behavioral heterogeneity: An Agent-Based Model exploration of farmer decision-making in the face of climate change
No full textSocial data, narratives, and agent-based modelling to explore farmers’ behaviour and climate change actions
No full textIntegrating agent-based modelling and behavioural data analytics: A case study of climate change farmers’ perception in Italy
No full textClimate change is arguably the most severe and complex challenge facing today’s society, a cross-cutting issue affecting many sectors and connected to other global challenges, such as ensuring sustainable water management and food security. Agricultural systems are adversely influenced by climate change through increased water stress, change in run-off patterns, seasonality fluctuation, and temperature variations. Farmers are, hence, a valuable source of first-hand observations of climate change as they may provide a deeper understanding of their manifestation, relevance, and effects. Social and behavioural sciences have investigated the influence of farmers' experiences in increasing climate change adaptation capability and improving decision-making processes at the system level. The conclusion is that local perceptions provide sufficient baseline information for understanding individual and collective exposure to climate risks, an essential element for effective policy formulation and implementation. Traditional management approaches based on simple, linear growth optimization strategies, overseen by command-and-control policies, have proven inadequate for effective adaptation to climate change. Conversely, accurate bottom-up approaches focused on social learning can complement the system transformation by building collaborative problem solving among individuals, stakeholders, and decision-makers. In this context, deepening social perception becomes fundamental for two main reasons: i) it is a key component of the socio-political context, and ii) it is an essential step for behaviour transformation and attitude change. In this line, associative processing methods, such as interviews and surveys, have been discussed for their ability to monitor the nature, extent, significance, and influence of personal experience on climate change adaptation. Also, modelling techniques have been recognized in social sciences as effective mechanisms to simulate the social influence in decision-making processes. System dynamics (e.g., causal loop diagrams, CLD) and Agent-Based Models (ABM) can include feedback between social and physical environments, define individuals’ and stakeholders’ narratives, and map the social network with agents’ interactions. This proposal aims at testing how qualitative data can enable policy-makers and managers to understand and re-think water management and climate change policies at the local level, which is essential to address agricultural risks. From a system dynamics approach, we examine how ABMs can most effectively integrate behavioural data collected from semi-structured interviews and surveys to increase robustness in decision-making processes while attending to farmers’ behaviour on climate change adaptation. We surveyed 460 farmers and semi-structured interviews with 13 irrigation consortiums from northern Italy to deepen a triple loop analysis on climate change awareness, perceived impacts, and adaptive capacity. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis and statistics have been applied to gain insights from interviews and identify farmers’ profiles from surveys. We included the profiles in an ABM coupled, in turn, with a distributed irrigation-soil-vegetation model that covers the irrigation district of the Adda river. Profiles influence agents' risk perception and their ultimate decision on the adopted crop type and irrigation method. Tentative results can enrich the discussion about the gaps and benefits of including qualitative data in agent-based modelling
A triple-loop survey to delve into physical climate storylines and address climate risk management: Learning from farmers’ perception and behaviour in northern Italy
No full textClimate change is both a physical and social phenomenon in which individual understandings are contextualized within broader considerations: individuals are not ‘blank slates’ receiving information about climate change, but that information is always and inevitably filtered through values and worldviews. Personal experience, local knowledge, and social-learning influence climate risk perception and vary substantially among countries and regions. Likewise, they differently affect individuals and social groups at the regional and local scale, among whom exposures, attitudes, and capacities to manage risks vary greatly. A climate storyline approach is hence well-suited to study human observations, compound climate risks, and inform and conceptualize human–water systems interactions. Narrative storylines are used as input drivers to climate models, to represent different development pathways, which are usually characterized and applied at national and sub-national scales. Storylines aim to provide new social scenarios that address local human cognition uncertainties and improve human behavior modelling and robustness when addressing decision-making processes. Climate risks and hazards understanding can be communicated by presenting the experiences or a sequence of events, facts, and observations that are plausible and potentially critical for the system under study. Methods guiding storytelling are usually focused on conducting interviews with stakeholders, carrying out collective workshops, developing appropriate focal questions, and iterating between model results and key stakeholders. Therefore, can other data collection tools be used to reduce uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change from individuals’ local experience and perception? This contribution presents a triple-loop survey to detail the core elements of farmers’ perception and behavior when addressing climate change risk. We collect first-hand observations from northern Italian farmers about how climate change affects their activity and how extreme events are conditioning their adaptation capacity. Emphasis is placed on understanding the driving factors (risk awareness, perceived impacts, and adaptation measures and barriers) involved in the physically self-consistent past events and the plausibility of those factors. Moreover, we want to test if these factors can provide relevant implications for appropriately modelling storylines in decision-making processes. Tentative results can be useful to discuss the methodological framework of storylines building and narratives modelling, and at which point surveys can be an alternative and complementary way of dealing with deep uncertainty within climate risk management and social scenarios modelling
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
