1,721,031 research outputs found
HuettelOpenPracticesDisclosure – Supplemental material for Indulgent Foods Can Paradoxically Promote Disciplined Dietary Choices
No full textSupplemental material, HuettelOpenPracticesDisclosure for Indulgent Foods Can Paradoxically Promote Disciplined Dietary Choices by Nicolette J. Sullivan, Gavan J. Fitzsimons, Michael L. Platt and Scott A. Huettel in Psychological Science</p
HuettelSupplementalMaterial – Supplemental material for Indulgent Foods Can Paradoxically Promote Disciplined Dietary Choices
No full textSupplemental material, HuettelSupplementalMaterial for Indulgent Foods Can Paradoxically Promote Disciplined Dietary Choices by Nicolette J. Sullivan, Gavan J. Fitzsimons, Michael L. Platt and Scott A. Huettel in Psychological Science</p
sj-pdf-1-mrj-10.1177_00222437231184830 - Supplemental material for Sharing Food Can Backfire: When Healthy Choices for Children Lead Parents to Make Unhealthy Choices for Themselves
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-mrj-10.1177_00222437231184830 for Sharing Food Can Backfire: When Healthy Choices for Children Lead Parents to Make Unhealthy Choices for Themselves by Kelley Gullo Wight, Peggy J. Liu, Lingrui Zhou and Gavan J. Fitzsimons in Journal of Marketing Research</p
sj-pdf-1-ppo-10.1177_07439156221145696 - Supplemental material for Celebrate Good Times: How Celebrations Increase Perceived Social Support
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-ppo-10.1177_07439156221145696 for Celebrate Good Times: How Celebrations Increase Perceived Social Support by Danielle J. Brick, Kelley Gullo Wight, James R. Bettman, Tanya L. Chartrand and Gavan J. Fitzsimons in Journal of Public Policy & Marketing</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully?
No full textAsking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully?
No full text- …
