170,059 research outputs found
NRS-18579 | Gaol reception book [Wagga Wagga Gaol]
<p>The Gaol reception book for Wagga Wagga Gaol is similar to an entrance book. It consists of numerous pages listing the names of inmates, date received in Gaol, sentence, when due for No.2 rations, religion, date of sentence, due by servitude to petition – later crossed out and replaced by “searching officer”, time expires by remission – later crossed out and replaced by “witness”, and time expires in full. The last paragraph “when due to grow hair, &c” has been left blank, with dates of discharges, acquittals or transfers listed instead. Most entries relate to prisoners with sentences of short duration.</p><p>Several inmates were transferred to Goulburn, Yass, Albury, Young, Bathurst, Cootamundra, Darlinghurst, Maitland, and Berrima Gaols, with others considered insane and transferred to Callan Park, Parramatta, the Reception House for the Insane (Darlinghurst), and the Benevolent Asylum.</p><p>The first prisoner's reception at Wagga Wagga Gaol was on 1 February 1886 and the last entry date recorded was on 12 January 1897. The last date time expires in full was listed as 14 May 1897, but the last remaining inmates - George Lynch or Hill, and James Darucody, were transferred to Goulburn Gaol on 25 January 1897.</p><p>The volume included two scraps of paper, one of which included the prisoner's signature of J. Bamfield and which had printed 'Wagga' on the reverse. Pasted in the front of the volume are almanacs (calendars) for 1888 and 1889 and a note recording the dates of circuit courts and Quarter Sessions to be held in Wagga Wagga in 1896.</p>
Male cell in "C"+"D" Wing at Fannie Bay Gaol
Male cell in "C"+"D" Wing at Fannie Bay Gaol. Shows five beds crowded in corner.Jaensch, Peter.Date:197
NRS-2191 | Photograph description book [Deniliquin Gaol]
<p>The series was created in accordance with the 'Gaol Regulations' proclaimed in the Supplement to the NSW Government Gazette of 19 February 1867. A 'Description Book' was required to be created and maintained by the Gaoler of each prison. The Description Book was to be kept in the same order as the Entrance Books and was to contain the following details: personal description, religion, and all other prescribed information of all prisoners received. An index to the Description Books also had to be maintained. Some prisons maintained description books prior to this regulation.</p><p>Photographing prisoners for inclusion in the Description Books commenced late in the nineteenth century, although it was not regulated until the mid twentieth century with the passage of the Prisons Act 1952 (Act No.9, 1952) which stated 'Every prisoner shall be liable to be photographed, to have the impression of his fingers and palms taken, and to have such details of his personal description as may be prescribed recorded.'</p><p>The series consists of individual loose-leaf sheets each including a photo or photographs of a prisoner, accompanied by the following details: number, prisoner name (and any aliases), date photograph was taken, native place, year of birth, arrival in colony (ship and year), trade or occupation prior to conviction, religion, degree of education, height, weight (on committal and at discharge), hair colour, eye colour, markings or special features, and convictions (where and when tried, offences and sentences). The sheets are usually handwritten, and most include two photos, showing front and side views of the prisoner from the chest up. Early sheets (up to c.1895) include only the front view, and one sheet (from 1929) also includes a full length shot of the prisoner from the front.</p>
Episodes in the history of the Hobart Gaol, c. 1910-1955
The old Hobart Gaol's history spans some one hundred and fifty years: from 1813 to 1963 when the last female inmates were transferred to the current Risdon Prison. During that time, its development as a gaol complex was haphazard and unplanned in the long term. The oldest part, portion of the House of Correction (H.C. Building) was originally erected not as a gaol, but as a Prisoners' Barracks or Penitentiary. The gaol proper, was in Murray Street opposite the Court House. The latter, \a miserable small ill-constructed brick building\" was used by prisoners awaiting trial across the road at the Supreme Court or for those awaiting execution. The gibbet was so placed that it protruded above the 10 ft. high wall which ran around the gaol. Between 1824 and 1839 there were 302 people executed here sometimes up to nine at a time. The gaol doubled as a Female Factory for female offenders up to 1827 when Thomas Lowe's Distillery at South Hobart was purchased and converted into a Female House of Correction. The Murray Street Gaol continued to be Hobart's Gaol until 1 January 1857 when the Campbell Street Penitentiary was proclaimed a Gaol and House of Correction. Additions and extensive alterations always needed to be made but these were done on an \"ad hoc\" basis. At Campbell Street a new barrack for the accommodation of male prisoners was needed and in 1821 Governor Lachlan Macquarie was able to report that a \"commodious\" building was nearing completion. This would house up to 300 male convicts. However this \"barrack\" was not intended as a gaol but as a holding station for male convicts arriving from England by ship and waiting for assignment. It was also used by the government to accommodate public works gangs and loan gangs who had to sleep there at night. Further alterations were needed five years later. In 1826 a committee consisting of the Colonial Architect the Superintendent of Public Works the Superintendent of the Barracks and the Principal Superintendent of Convicts reported that another barrack was needed \"at the further wing fronting the gate and extending in a line to the Superintendent's quarters.\" This would accommodate another 640 men primarily engaged in public works. Internal alterations were also needed. In 1827 the Principal Superintendent reported that a further twenty to twenty four cells and a lock up room for country convicted persons was needed. From these statistics it can be deduced that the Barracks were no longer being used simply as sleeping quarters for convicts. The need for more convict cells was all the more urgent as the Female Factory had still not opened to take female offenders from Murray Street. By 1841 approval had been given for the construction of 33 new cells. The numbers of men held in the Barracks and the House of Correction was nearly 1000. Further alterations in 1859 cost £1750. Having a gaol situated within the city boundaries was not unknown but where a city had been planned such as Hobart was questions concerning its placement and reasons for its construction need to be asked. There are several reasons: firstly the unpredictable but obvious development of Hobart from a prison colony to a flourishing free colony very soon placed the site of the Campbell Street Gaol in the middle of an expanding metropolis: Sprent's map of 1841 shows the Gaol no longer discretely at the village of Hobart Town but very much in the middle of town. Even by 1839 the town boundary had been pushed as far north as Burnett Street and the village of New Town further out had many \"tasteful\" residences of \"the wealthier merchants government officers and professional men.\" The bureaucracy could not have predicted nor even imagined the objections by the turn of the century that the Gaol had become \"an eyesore\" a constant reminder to the citizens of their convict past and with the frequent escapes of the inmates a danger to themselves. A second theme which runs in the background of this study of the Hobart Gaol is the nineteenth century view of penology: Reformers believed by the end of that century that gaols should be quite separate institutions to the Houses of Correction. The Penitentiary in Campbell Street had been set up after 1857 with the idea that time there should be thoroughly unpleasant with \"hard labour\" \"possibly on a treadmill.\" In addition to hard labour reformation of the individual through \"religious education and moral training\" was necessary. Selected prisoners could serve their sentence in these carefully controlled conditions and ideally be returned to society reformed individuals. By the end of the century the treadmill concept had been replaced by a trade: bootmaking carpentry blacksmithing. Borstal prisons were set up to take in adolescent offenders in the hope that by concentrating on their special needs psychological and physical they too could be rehabilitated and returned to society. On the other hand there were the criminals. The nineteenth century view of these can clearly be seen in the 1883 Report on Penal Discipline in Tasmania. Their treatment no matter what the term of their sentence in gaol included solitary confinement single cells and exclusion from human contact except at work and in exercise yard.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Analisis Atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 2838 K/Pdt/2009 Pada Kasus Kewarisan Antara Mindo Lumban Gaol Melawan Indiana Lumban Gaol
(A) Nama : Wawan Kennardi (205080054). (B) Judul Skripsi : Analisis Atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 2838 K/Pdt/2009 Pada Kasus Kewarisan Antara Mindo Lumban Gaol Melawan Indiana Lumban Gaol (C) Halaman : vi + 126 + 21 + 2008 (D) Kata kunci : Kewarisan. (E) Isi : Di dalam pewarisan dari orangtua ke anak, maka yang menjadi harta waris tidak lain adalah harta perkawinan itu sendiri. Di dalam pewarisan dari orangtua kepada anaknya, yang menjadi harta waris adalah segala harta peninggalan orangtua yang dihasilkan selama perkawinan itu berlangsung. Dalam kaitannya dengan harta warisan, penulis ingin membahas secara khusus mengenai bidang tanah bersertipikat Hak Milik yang dibeli pewaris menggunakan atas nama ahliwaris, yang dimasukkan ke dalam bagian harta boedel waris oleh pengadilan. Hal ini menjadi masalah ketika sertipikat tanah yang seharusnya merupakan alat bukti yang sah justru dikalahkan di muka pengadilan. Berdasarkan latar belakang dapat dirumuskan masalah sebagai berikut: Apakah yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2838 K/Pdt/2009 atas kasus kewarisan antara Mindo Lumban Gaol melawan Indiana Lumban Gaol? Dan Apakah jual-beli tanah yang dilakukan seorang ayah dengan mengatasnamakan anaknya sah menurut hukum?. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam perkara perdata No. 58/Pdt.G/2001/PN.Jak.Sel, PengadilanNegeri Jakarta Selatan telah menjatuhkan putusannya pada tanggal 24 Oktober 2002 tentang harta peninggalan para pewaris yang tercatat atas nama Mangaratua Lumba Gaol (alm) dan Dumatiar Sitompul (almh) sebagai harta peninggalan yang harus dibagi diantara ahliwarisnya yang masing-masing memperoleh (sepertiga) bagian bilamana tidak terealisir, harta tersebut dijual lelang dan selanjutnya dibagi di antara para ahliwaris. Pada akhirnya dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 2838 K/Pdt/2009, bidang-bidang tanah yang dibeli pewaris dengan atas nama para ahli waris pun dimasukkan ke dalam bagian boedel harta warisan dan ikut dibagi sepertiga sama rata kepada para ahliwarisnya. Saran penulis sebaiknya BPN dalam menerbitkan sertipikat tanah dan PPAT dalam penandatanganan akta jual beli harus memperhatikan bahwa pihak-pihak yang bersangkutan telah cakap hukum. (A) Acuan : 21 (1987-2008). (B) Pembimbing : Hanafi Tanawijaya, S.H., M.H. (C) Penulis : Wawan Kennardi
Mitomycin C in highly myopic eyes - Author reply
Ophthalmology. 2005 Feb;112(2):208-18; discussion 219.
Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes.
Gambato C, Ghirlando A, Moretto E, Busato F, Midena E.
SourceRefractive Surgery Service and Antimetabolite Therapy Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of topical mitomycin C in corneal wound healing (CWH) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in highly myopic eyes.
DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients affected by high (>7 diopters) myopia.
METHODS: In each patient, one eye was randomly assigned to PRK with intraoperative topical 0.02% mitomycin C application, and the fellow eye was treated with a placebo. Postoperatively, mitomycin C-treated eyes received artificial tears (3 times daily, tapered in 3 months), whereas the fellow eye was treated with fluorometholone sodium 2% and artificial tears (3 times daily, tapered in 3 months).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, manifest refraction, and biomicroscopy. Contrast sensitivity was determined using the Pelli-Robson chart. Corneal confocal microscopy documented CWH.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 12-36). No side effects or toxic effects were documented. At 12-month follow-up examination, UCVAs (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) were 0.4+/-0.48 and 0.5+/-0.53 (P = .03) in mitomycin C-treated eyes and corticosteroid-treated eyes, respectively. At 1 year, corneal haze developed in 20% of corticosteroid-treated eyes, versus 0% of mitomycin C-treated eyes. At 12, 24, and 36 months, corneal confocal microscopy showed activated keratocytes and extracellular matrix significantly more evident in untreated eyes (Ps = 0.004, 0.024, and 0.046, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Topical intraoperative application of 0.02% mitomycin C can reduce haze formation in highly myopic eyes undergoing PRK.
Comment in
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):357; author reply 357-8
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Papers of C L Kuffer
This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/64157Black and white photographic prints showing views of Maryborough: the lake, the Duke and Timor (1876), streetscape and old stores including the Leviathan, the Benevolent Home, the Gaol, the Empire Dining Room, the Hospital (1857), the Lead Pottery.113551
Acquisition: [1962.0005] "Papers of C L Kuffer
- …
