1,721,789 research outputs found

    Fotografía UDBC013882

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Galeano, M. 4, determinado como Pachira humilis en el año 201

    Fotografía UDBC015770

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Galeano, M. 3148, determinado como Heliconia hirsuta en el año 199

    Fotografía UDBC013861

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Galeano, M. 1257 (b), determinado como Virola venosa en el año 199

    Fotografía UDBC013970

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Galeano, M. 525, determinado como Sauvagesia fruticosa en el año 199

    Fotografía UDBC013968

    No full text
    Fotografía del ejemplar Galeano, M. 91, determinado como Miconia tocohirta en el año 199

    Valoración de la empresa Eléctricas Galeano M S.A.S

    No full text
    ELECTRICAS GALEANO M S A S, es una empresa familiar, que por motivos de competitividad y permanencia en el mercado, se le hace necesario realizar la valoración de la compañía. En este sentido, es objetivo de este proyecto, definir un método de valoración de empresas que se ajuste a las necesidades planteadas por la organización, con el fin de establecer una estrategia para la toma de decisiones. Partiendo del previo conocimiento de la información financiera de la compañía, información de los procesos internos, información del sector de la competencia y del mercado, se determinó que el método de valoración que se ajusta a la empresa ELECTRICAS GALEANO M S A S, es el método basado en múltiplos de la cuenta de resultados. Éste posibilita obtener un comparativo de los resultados de la empresa en cada período y así evidenciar si a lo largo del tiempo la organización ha generado valor, para la toma de decisiones como asignación de porcentajes de participación, inversiones, valor de venta de la empresa, estrategias de sostenibilidad y continuidad en la generación de valor en el tiempo

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore