1,721,026 research outputs found
Clinical Presentation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
No full textGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. They constitute 1-2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms but are the most common subtype of soft tissue sarcomas, accounting for 20-25%. In the late 1990s, GISTs were more and more recognized as a particular tumor entity. The tumors are supposed to originate from the interstitial pacemaker cells of Cajal. They are usually well circumscribed and can be located in every part of the tubular gastrointestinal tract. Most often GISTs occur in the stomach, followed by the small bowel and colon/rectum. In contrast to epithelial tumors, GISTs grow transmurally and submucosal. GISTs can be found with highly variable growth features including tumors with intraluminal, intra- or transmural, and pedunculated appearance. Here we describe the most common clinical presentation of GISTs on the basis of our 809 patients managed from 2004 to 2017. The median age of our patients was 59 years and the average size of GIST was 75 mm (range: 4 mm to 35 cm). The clinical presentation is very heterogeneous, depending on tumor site, size, and growth pattern. GISTs of the stomach is the group with the lowest rate of acute or emergency symptoms with 31%, followed by GISTs of the duodenum with 42%, whereas GISTs of the small bowel show acute symptoms in more than 50% of the cases and have an emergency surgery rate of almost 15%. Many patients are diagnosed accidentally, through screening examinations, or with latent, unspecific symptoms
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
DNA-Methylation Analysis as a Tool for Thymoma Classification
No full textBackground: Thymomas are malignant thymic epithelial tumors that are difficult to diagnose due to their rarity and complex diagnostic criteria. They represent a morphologically heterogeneous class of tumors mainly defined by “organo-typical” architectural features and cellular composition. The diagnosis of thymoma is burdened with a high level of inter-observer variability and the problem that some type-specific morphological alterations are more on the continuum than clear-cut. Methylation pattern-based classification may help to increase diagnostic precision, particularly in borderline cases. Methods and Results: We applied array-based DNA methylation analysis to a set of 113 thymomas with stringent histological annotation. Unsupervised clustering and t-SNE analysis of DNA methylation data clearly segregated thymoma samples mainly according to the current WHO classification into A, AB, B1, B2, B2/B3, B3, and micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma. However, methylation analyses separated the histological subgroups AB and B2 into two methylation classes: mono-/bi-phasic AB-thymomas and conventional/“B1-like” B2-thymomas. Copy number variation analysis demonstrated methylation class-specific patterns of chromosomal alterations. Interpretation: Our study demonstrates that the current WHO classification is generally well reflected at the methylation level but suggests that B2- and AB-thymomas are (epi)genetically heterogeneous. Methylation-based classifications could help to refine diagnostic criteria for thymoma classification, improve reproducibility, and may affect treatment decisions
Outcome and prognostic factors of desmoplastic medulloblastoma treated within a multidisciplinary treatment concept
Full text linkAbstract Background Desmoplasia in medulloblastoma is often diagnosed in adult patients and was repeatedly associated with improved results. Today, all medulloblastoma patients receive intensive multimodal treatment including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This study was set up to investigate treatment outcome and prognostic factors after radiation therapy in patients with desmoplastic medulloblastomas. Methods Twenty patients treated for desmoplastic medulloblastoma in the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Heidelberg between 1984 and 2007 were included. Data were collected retrospectively. Tumor resection was performed in all patients. All patients underwent postsurgical radiotherapy (RT). Two patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 18 patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). In all patients, an additional boost was delivered to the posterior fossa. The median dose to the whole brain and the craniospinal axis was 35.2 Gray (Gy), and 54.4 Gy to the posterior fossa. Fourteen patients received chemotherapy, including seven who were treated with combined radiochemotherapy and twelve who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Median follow-up was 59 months. Overall (OS), local (LPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) was 80%, 71.2%, and 83.3% at 60 months. Patients who suffered from local or distant relapses had significantly worse outcome. Five patients died from recurrent medulloblastoma. Treatment-associated toxicity was acceptable. Conclusions Multimodal approaches with surgical resection followed by chemoirradiation achieved high response rates with long OS in desmoplastic medulloblastoma patients. Staging parameters expected to predict for poor prognosis did not significantly influence outcome. However, success of any first line regimen had strong impact on disease control, and remission was achieved in no patient with relapsing disease. Multimodal concepts must be evaluated in further clinical trials.</p
Molecular and Pathological Profiling of Corresponding Treatment-Naïve and Neoadjuvant Pazopanib-Treated High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma Samples of the GISG-04/NOPASS Study
No full textIn the framework of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group GISG-04/NOPASS trial, we evaluated soft tissue sarcoma samples taken before and after neoadjuvant pazopanib therapy using histopathology and next generation sequencing (NGS) to find potential predictive biomarkers. We also aimed to improve the genetically based sarcoma classification and to elucidate additional potentially druggable mutations. In total, 30 tumor samples from 18 patients consisting of 12 pre-therapeutic biopsies and 18 resection specimens following neoadjuvant pazopanib therapy were available for analyses. NGS was performed with the Oncomine Focus Assay (Ion Torrent) covering 0.03 Mb of DNA and enabled the detection of genetic variants in 52 cancer-relevant genes. Pathological analysis showed significant regression (≥50%) after pazopanib treatment in only one undifferentiated (pleomorphic) sarcoma. NGS analyses revealed a very high frequency of CDK4 amplification (88%; 7/8) in the group of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In addition, two potentially druggable mutations, a MAP2K1 missense mutation (E203K) and a BRAF missense mutation (V600E), were traceable in two undifferentiated (pleomorphic) sarcoma patients (11%; 2/18). Our findings demonstrate that NGS testing is a powerful technology helping to improve diagnostic accuracy and offering some patients the chance for personalized medicine even in a “mutation unlikely” cohort like STS
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
