1,720,963 research outputs found
Ascertainment of death: a certain death and ascertained death [Accertamento della morte: morte certa e morte accertata.]
No full textNota su di un presunto cranio "chiodato" rinvenuto nella necropoli romana di Monterotondo (II-III sec.d.C.).
No full text
Histological analysis and staining techniques modified and verified on ancient mummified tissues to study microorganism infestations.
No full textThe purpose of this work is to give a brief account of the possibility to estimate the preservation of human mummified tissues using histological analysis. This method can be useful to identify injuries and to plan qualified conservative actions on ancient human remains. Some preliminary results are presented here regarding the study on 16 ancient mummies from the Egyptian Museum of Turin. Samples of mummified tissues were taken without damaging the remains; they were hydrated again and dyed with histological techniques which were specifically modified and verified in same cases. Our research identifies some agents (biological and chemical) that appear to be responsible, among others, of mummified tissue destruction. The microscopic examination reveals features that might refer to fungal and bacterial infestation. Using special staining methods on seried sections we were able to suspect, at least in one case, the presence of biologically active forms. Microbiological assays confirm the vitality of fungi. Histological tissue analysis can then be useful to guide any conservative intervention for preservation and protection of the integrity of biological remains from museum collections
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
