1,720,978 research outputs found
Spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings in pancreatic and other abdominal manifestations of Von Hippel-Lindau disease in a series of 23 patients: a pictorial review
Bull's-eye pattern of pancreatic-duct stones on multidetector computed tomography and gene-mutation-associated pancreatitis (GMAP).
PURPOSE:This study prospectively assessed whether the presence of a bull's-eye pattern of pancreatic-duct stones on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) correlated with gene-mutation-associated pancreatitis (GMAP) and whether other signs suggestive of GMAP can be detected with MDCT.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Forty-seven patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis underwent genetic testing for CFTR, SPINK1 and PRSS1 mutations and an MDCT scan of the abdomen. Qualitative analysis assessed the presence or absence of pancreatic-duct stones with bull's-eye appearance. Quantitative analysis included the number and maximum diameter of stones and the diameter of the main pancreatic duct.RESULTS:Fifteen of 47 patients (32%) were positive for gene mutations (GMAP patients). The bull's-eye pattern was found in 10/15 patients (67%) with GMAP and in 4/32 (12%) patients with chronic pancreatitis not associated with GMAP (NGMAP; p<0.0001). The mean diameter of duct stones was 15 mm in patients with GMAP and 10 mm in patients with NGMAP (p<0.04).CONCLUSIONS:The presence of duct stones with a bull's-eye pattern correlates with GMAP. Duct stones with diameter ≥15 mm are another sign suggestive of GMAP
Direct involvement of the spleen in pancreatitis; a pictorial essay
Direct involvement of the spleen in pancreatic inflammatory disease was observed in nine patients with pancreatits, six with pseudocysts during chronic pancreatitis and three with acute pancreatitis. Three kinds of involvement (perisplenic, intrasplenic and mixed) are recognized and the prominent role of CT in this condition is discussed
Autoimmune pancreatitis: CT patterns and their changes after steroid treatment.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the computed tomographic (CT) patterns of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and their changes after steroid therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigational review board approval was obtained, and the informed consent requirement was waived. The medical and imaging data of 21 patients (13 men, eight women; mean age, 47.5 years; age range, 25-79 years) with histopathologically proved AIP who underwent contrast material-enhanced CT at diagnosis and after steroid treatment were included in this study. Image analysis included assessment of the (a) presence or absence and type (focal or diffuse) of pancreatic parenchyma enlargement, (b) contrast enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma, (c) size of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) within the lesion and upstream, and (d) pancreatic parenchyma thickness in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas. The same criteria were applied to follow-up CT examinations, the follow-up data were compared with pretreatment data, and a paired sample t test was applied. RESULTS: Pancreatic parenchyma showed focal enlargement in 14 (67%) patients and diffuse enlargement in seven (33%). Pancreatic parenchyma affected by AIP appeared hypoattenuating in 19 (90%) patients and isoattenuating in two (10%). During the portal venous phase, pancreatic parenchyma showed contrast material retention in 18 (86%) patients and contrast material washout in three (14%). The MPD was never visible within the lesion. After treatment, there was a reduction in the size of pancreatic parenchyma segments affected by AIP (P < .05). Fifteen (71%) of the 21 patients had a normal enhancement pattern in the pancreatic parenchyma, whereas the enhancement pattern remained hypovascular in six (29%). The MPD returned to its normal size within the lesion in all patients at follow-up CT. In one of the eight patients with focal forms of AIP, the upstream MPD remained dilated. CONCLUSION: AIP appeared as pancreatic parenchyma enlargement, with MPD stenosis within the lesion and upstream dilatation in focal forms of AIP. After steroid treatment, there was normalization of these findings. (c) RSNA, 2008
Recurrent uterine cancer after surgery: magnetic resonance imaging patterns and their changes after concomitant chemoradiation
PURPOSE:
Our primary objective was to describe the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging patterns of recurrent uterine cancer after surgery and their changes following concurrent chemoradiation. The secondary objective was to identify MR imaging predictors of outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Twenty-two consecutive women with biopsy-proven recurrent uterine cancer after surgery (cervix 13 patients, endometrium nine patients) were enrolled in this prospective study. Inclusion criteria were MR imaging at diagnosis and during follow-up and eligibility for concurrent chemoradiation. MR images were assessed for signal intensity of the pelvic relapse on T2-weighted images, site of relapse and infiltration of adjacent organs. Pre- and posttreatment MR images were compared on the basis of the same criteria. The 3D volume of relapses after treatment was calculated, and tumour response to treatment was evaluated as complete, partial, no change or disease progression.
RESULTS:
Recurrences appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted images in 22/22 (100%) patients. Pelvic relapse site was vagina in 5/22 (23%), vaginal vault in 9/22 (41%), vaginal vault with extension to the pelvic wall in 5/22 (23%) and pelvic wall in 3/22 (13%). Infiltration of adjacent organs was detected in 9/22 (41%) patients. The mean volume of recurrences on pretreatment MR images was 38.83 cm(3). On posttreatment MR images, relapses appeared hypointense in 19/22 (86%) patients and hyperintense in 3/22 (14%). The mean volume of recurrences on posttreatment MR images was 18.01 cm(3). Complete response was seen in 11/22 (50%) patients, partial response in 8/22 (36%) and no change in 3/22 (14%).
CONCLUSIONS:
MR imaging can provide an evaluation of all parameters necessary for planning treatment and assessing response to treatment
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
