1,720,997 research outputs found

    Universal newborn hearing screening programs in Italy: survey of year 2006.

    No full text
    Our results suggest a rapid diffusion of newborn hearing screening programs in Italy and indicate that three conditions seem to play a crucial role in the implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs: the size (800 births/year) and location (metropolitan urban areas) of the hospital, and the presence of an audiologist in the UNHS coordinating team Objectives. The aim of this paper is to provide data on the degree of implementation and coverage of UNHS programs in Italy Materials and methods. Data were collected through a Screening Survey Questionnaire that was sent to all birthing hospitals active in Italy in 2006 and was filled in by the chief of the hospital or by the UNHS program coordinator Results. In Italy UNHS coverage had undergone a steep increase from 29.3% in 2003 (156 048 newborns screened) to 48.4% in 2006 (262 103 screened). The majority of UNHS programs were implemented in the two most economically developed areas, i.e. in the north-west area (79.5%, 108 200 of 136 109 births), and in the north-east area (57.2%, 52 727 of 92 133 births), while a limited diffusion still remains in some areas, typically in the islands (11.3%, 7158 of 63 460 births)

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore