1,720,995 research outputs found
Olivier (J.-P.), Godart (L.), Corpus hieroglyphicarum inscriptionum Cretae. J.-C. Poursat, coll., 1996
No full textCarlier Pierre. Olivier (J.-P.), Godart (L.), Corpus hieroglyphicarum inscriptionum Cretae. J.-C. Poursat, coll., 1996. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 101, 1999, n°1-2. pp. 242-244
Olivier (J.-P.), Godart (L), Seydel (C), Sourvinou (C), Index généraux du linéaire
No full textDuhoux Yves. Olivier (J.-P.), Godart (L), Seydel (C), Sourvinou (C), Index généraux du linéaire. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 53, fasc. 4, 1975. Histoire (depuis l'Antiquité) — Geschiedenis (sedert de Oudheid) p. 1302
23. Chadwick (J.), Godart (L.), Killen (J. T.), Olivier (J.-P.), Sacconi (Α.), Sakellarakis (I. Α.), Corpus of Mycenaean Inscriptions from Knossos, Volume II (1064-4495)
No full textFaure Paul. 23. Chadwick (J.), Godart (L.), Killen (J. T.), Olivier (J.-P.), Sacconi (Α.), Sakellarakis (I. Α.), Corpus of Mycenaean Inscriptions from Knossos, Volume II (1064-4495). In: Revue des Études Grecques, tome 105, fascicule 502-503, Juillet-décembre 1992. pp. 612-613
Colloquium Romanum. Atti del XII Colloquio internazionale di micenologia, Roma, 20-25 febbraio 2006
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
