1,720,982 research outputs found
Fig. 35 in A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae)
Get PDFFig. 35. Distribution map of Achilia antennalis (excluding Argentina) based on examined material.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 131, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Achilia tumidifrons Jeannel 1962
No full textAchilia tumidifrons group Jeannel (1962: 398, 402) characterized this group as follows: elytra with 2 basal foveae; basal striae of abdominal tergite I separated by 1/3 of tergal width; head with broad transverse occipital hump in male; frons not narrowed anteriorly in female; male antennomere X not enlarged; copulatory pieces of aedeagus thin. The group currently includes A. larvata (Reitter, 1885), A. tumidifrons Jeannel, 1962, A. globiceps Jeannel, 1962, and A. paraglobiceps Franz, 1996. However, we place all of these names as A. larvata, becoming the only constitutive member in the unfortunately named tumidifrons group.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 123, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Achilia bifossifrons
No full textAchilia bifossifrons group Jeannel (1962: 397, 404) characterized this group as follows: elytra with 3 basal foveae; basal striae of abdominal tergite I separated at most by 1/4 of tergal width; head with broad transverse occipital hump in male; frons not narrowed anteriorly in female; male antennomere X not enlarged; copulatory pieces of aedeagus thin. The only member of this group has always been Achilia bifossifrons.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 127, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Achilia nahuelbutae Franz 1996
No full textAchilia nahuelbutae Franz, 1996 Achilia nahuelbutae Franz, 1996: 115, fig. 62 (aedeagus). Comments: We have examined the type series of this species, which is housed in NHMW. The holotype appears to be a male of the cosmoptera group, while paratypes belong to at least two other Achilia species of the kindermanni and the grandiceps groups, and includes a specimen of the tribe Euplectini. All of these taxa except the member of the Euplectini will be dealt with in a later paper.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 123, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Achilia parvula Jeannel 1962
No full textAchilia parvula Jeannel, 1962 Achilia parvula Jeannel, 1962: 401. Comments: According to the original description the holotype and only known specimen of A. parvula should have been deposited in the MHNS, however we found it in the MNHN. In the catalog of the MHNS holotypes of insects (Camousseight, 1980) this taxon is not mentioned. It appears to be a female of the humidula group, which will be dealt with in a later paper.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 122, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Achilia lobifera Jeannel 1962
No full textAchilia lobifera group Jeannel (1962: 397, 405) characterized this group as follows: elytra with 3 basal foveae; basal striae of abdominal tergite I separated by 1/3 of tergal width; head of male with high and narrow frontal protuberance bordered by two pits with marginal denticulations; male antennomere IV lobed; internal sac of aedeagus forming “bouquet” of spines. The group consists in A. antennalis Jeannel, 1962 and A. lobifera Jeannel, 1962.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 132, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Erratum: GIORGIO SABELLA & ADAM ŠÍMA (2016) Study on Tychini of Balkan Peninsula (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae). Zootaxa, 4200 (4): 591–599.
No full textAchilia crassicornis Jeannel 1962
No full textAchilia crassicornis species group Jeannel (1962: 397, 400) characterized this group as follows: elytra with 3 basal foveae; basal striae of abdominal tergite I separated at most by 1/3 of tergal width; head with broad transverse occipital hump in male; frons not narrowed anteriorly in female; male antennomere X very big and asymmetrical; copulatory pieces of aedeagus thin. This group currently includes A. crassicornis antarctica Jeannel, 1962; A. crassicornis crassicornis Jeannel, 1962; A. obscura Jeannel, 1962; A. parvula Jeannel, 1962, and A. nahuelbutae Franz, 1996. However, as A. parvula and A. nahuelbutae appeared to belong to the humidula and the cosmoptera groups respectively, and A. crassicornis antarctica and A. obscura are here placed as junior synonyms of A. crassicornis, the only taxon left in the crassicornis species group is A. crassicornis itself.Published as part of Giorgio Sabella, Sergey A. Kurbatov & Giulio Cuccodoro, 2017, A revision of the Chilean Brachyglutini - Part 2. Revision of Achilia Reitter, 1890: A. crassicornis, A. tumidifrons, A. bifossifrons, and A. lobifera species groups (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), pp. 119-140 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (1) on page 120, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.32267
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
