1,720,966 research outputs found
FIGURE 2 in A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran
No full textFIGURE 2. Geological map of Gohreh area, North of Bandar Abbas (redrawn from Talebi, 2006 and Gharabeigli, 2005).Published as part of Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2) on page 141, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/640496
FIGURE 4 in A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran
No full textFIGURE 4. Stratigraphic Columns of Bastak (A) and Gohreh (B) sections, and the position of crab bearing beds (Fig. 4b after Gholamalian et al. 2015).Published as part of Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2) on page 144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/640496
FIGURE 1 in A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran
No full textFIGURE 1. Map showing Zagros geological zone of Iran and the collection localities of Galene dashtbani sp. nov. in Gohreh and Bastak sections, north and west of Bandar Abbas, south of Iran.Published as part of Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2) on page 140, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/640496
FIGURE 5 in A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran
No full textFIGURE 5. Galene dashtbani sp. nov.: A–B, dorsal (A) and front (B) stereo-pair views of holotype ZUTC6881, carapace; C–H, dorsal stereo-pair (C), front stereo-pair (D), left lateral (E), right lateral (F), ventral (G) and posterior (H) views of non-type HUIM195, carapace; I–J, dorsal (I) and front (J) views of non-type HUIM196, carapace; K, dorsal view of paratype HUIM197, carapace; L, dorsal view of paratype HUIM198, carapace. Scale bars = 10 mm.Published as part of Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2) on page 146, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/640496
FIGURE 6 in A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran
No full textFIGURE 6. Galene dashtbani sp. nov.: A–C, dorsal (A), right lateral (B) and ventral (C) views of paratype HUIM199, eroded carapace and partial cheliped; D, dorsal view of paratype HUIM200, eroded carapace; E, dorsal view of paratype HUIM201, eroded carapace; F–G, dorsal (F) and ventral (G) views of paratype HUIM202, eroded carapace and fragmentary cheliped; H–I, ventral (H) and left lateral (I) views of paratype HUIM203, cheliped; J–K, ventral (J) and dorsal (K) views of paratype HUIM204, cheliped and partial carapace. Scale bars = 10 mm.Published as part of Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2) on page 147, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/640496
Galenidae Alcock 1898
No full textFamily Galenidae Alcock, 1898 <p> <b>Remarks</b>. <i>Galene</i> has been classified in the Xanthidae (e.g., Balss 1957; Glaessner 1969; Takeda 1976), whereas Guinot (1969a, 1969b, 1969c, 1971) assigned <i>Galene</i> to “ Goneplacidae pilumniens <i>sensu lato</i> ”. This suggestion was followed by a number of scholars (Ng 1998; Schweitzer 2000; Ng e <i>t al</i>. 2001; Hsueh & Huang 2002; Ng <i>et al</i>. 2008), who classified <i>Galene</i> within (or close to) the Pilumnidae. Ng <i>et al.</i> (2008) summarized the taxonomic history of Galenidae, which was included in the superfamily Pilumnoidea.</p> <p> The family Galenidae Alcock, 1898, as currently recognized, consists of four genera (Ng <i>et al.</i> 2008; De Grave <i>et al</i>. 2009; Ng & Guinot 2021; Ng & Mitra 2021): <i>Dentoxanthus</i> Stephensen, 1946; <i>Galene</i> de Haan, 1833; <i>Halimede</i> de Hann, 1835; and <i>Parapanope</i> de Man, 1895. The fossil record of Galenidae is limited to representatives of <i>Galene</i> and <i>Halimede</i> (Schweitzer <i>et al.</i> 2010).</p> <p> Although there are some difficulties in a detailed morphological diagnosis of Galenidae, Guinot <i>et al</i>. (2013) denote the emergence of the penis from P5 coxo-sternal condyle as a diagnostic trait of this family; however, it is not usually possible to study such fragile elements in fossils.</p>Published as part of <i>Khosravi, Erfan, Sari, Alireza, Mirziee-Ataabadi, Majid, Gholamalian, Hossein & Hyžný, Matúš, 2022, A new species of Galene de Haan, 1833 (Galenidae: Brachyura) from the middle Miocene of Zagros Mountains, Iran, pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5124 (2)</i> on page 144, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.2.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6404962">http://zenodo.org/record/6404962</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
