1,721,015 research outputs found

    The Interplay Between Respiratory Supercomplexes and ROS in Aging

    Full text link
    Significance: The molecular mechanism of aging is still vigorously debated, although a general consensus exists that mitochondria are significantly involved in this process. However, the previously postulated role of mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) as the damaging agents inducing functional loss in aging has fallen out of favor in the recent past. In this review, we critically examine the role of ROS in aging in the light of recent advances on the relationship between mitochondrial structure and function. Recent Advances: The functional mitochondrial respiratory chain is now recognized as a reflection of the dynamic association of respiratory complexes in the form of supercomplexes (SCs). Besides providing kinetic advantage (channeling), SCs control ROS generation by the respiratory chain, thus providing a means to regulate ROS levels in the cell. Depending on their concentration, these ROS are either physiological signals essential for the life of the cell or toxic species that damage cell structure and functions. Critical Issues: We propose that under physiological conditions the dynamic nature of SCs reversibly controls the generation of ROS as signals involved in mitochondrial- nuclear communication. During aging, there is a progressive loss of control of ROS generation so that their production is irreversibly enhanced, inducing a vicious circle in which signaling is altered and structural damage takes place. Future Directions: A better understanding on the forces affecting SC association would allow the manipulation of ROS generation, directing these species to their physiological signaling role

    Chapter 5. Mitochondrial Supercomplexes and ROS Regulation: Implications for Ageing

    No full text
    CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Respiratory Supercomplexes: Structure and Function 5.2.1 Molecular Composition 5.2.2 Dynamic Nature and Kinetic Advantage of Supercomplexes 5.3 ROS Generation by Mitochondria 5.3.1 Respiratory Chain as a Source of ROS 5.3.1.1 Complex I 5.3.1.2 Complex III 5.3.1.3 Other Respiratory Enzymes 5.4 Mitochondrial ROS as Signals: Targets and Mechanisms 5.5 Regulation of Mitochondrial ROS Generation 5.5.1 Role of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential 5.5.2 Role of Post-Translational Modifications 5.5.3 Hypoxia and ROS Production 5.5.4 Role of Supercomplexes 5.6 ROS and Mitochondrial Quality Control 5.7 Implications for Ageing 5.7.1 Unifying Hypothesis Involving Supercomplex Destabilization in Agein

    Coenzyme Q Function in Mitochondria

    No full text
    In this chapter we provide a review with a focus on the function of Coenzyme Q (CoQ, ubiquinone) in mitochondria. The notion of a mobile pool of CoQ in the lipid bilayer as the vehicle of electrons from respiratory complexes has somewhat changed with the discovery of respiratory supramolecular units, in particular the supercomplex comprising Complexes I and III; in such assembly the electron transfer is thought to be mediated by direct channelling, and we provide evidence for a kinetic advantage on the transfer based on random collisions. The CoQ pool, however, has a fundamental function in establishing a dissociation equilibrium with bound CoQ, besides being required for electron transfer from other dehydrogenases to Complex III. CoQ bound to Complex I and to Complex III is also involved in proton translocation; although the mechanism of the Q-cycle is well established for Complex III, the involvement of CoQ in proton translocation by Complex I is still debated. This review also briefly examines some additional roles of CoQ, such as the antioxidant effect of its reduced form and its postulated action at the transcriptional level

    Complex I function in mitochondrial supercomplexes

    Full text link
    This review discusses the functional properties of mitochondrial Complex I originating from its presence in an assembled form as a supercomplex comprising Complex III and Complex IV in stoichiometric ratios. In particular several lines of evidence are presented favouring the concept that electron transfer from Complex I to Complex III is operated by channelling of electrons through Coenzyme Q molecules bound to the supercomplex, in contrast with the hypothesis that the transfer of reducing equivalents from Complex I to Complex III occurs via random diffusion of the Coenzyme Q molecules in the lipid bilayer. Furthermore, another property provided by the supercomplex assembly is the control of generation of reactive oxygen species by Complex I. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Respiratory Complex I, edited by Volker Zickermann and Ulrich Brandt

    Coenzyme Q and respiratory supercomplexes: physiological and pathological implications

    No full text
    It was discovered over 60 years ago that the mitochondrial respiratory chain is constituted of a series of protein complexes imbedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Experimental evidence has more recently ascertained that the major respiratory complexes involved in energy conservation are assembled as supramolecular units (supercomplexes, SCs) in stoichiometric ratios. The functional role of SCs is less well defined, and still open to discussion. Several lines of evidence favour the concept that electron transfer from Complex I to Complex III operates by channelling of electrons through Coenzyme Q molecules bound to the SC I1III2IVn, in contrast with the previously accepted hypothesis that the transfer of reducing equivalents from Complex I to Complex III occurs via random diffusion of the Coenzyme Q molecules in the lipid bilayer. On the contrary, electron transfer from Complex III to Complex IV seems to operate, at least in mammals, by random diffusion of cytochrome c molecules between the respiratory complexes even if assembled in SCs. Furthermore, another property provided by the supercomplex assembly is the control of generation of reactive oxygen species by Complex I, that might be important in the regulation of signal transduction from mitochondria. This review discusses physiological and pathological implications of the supercomplex assembly of the respiratory chain

    Two separate though interconneted route underlie NADH and succinate oxidation:kinetic evidence for different functional compartments of Coenzyme Q and/or Complex III.

    No full text
    The discovery of respiratory supercomplexes (SCs) led to the proposal that electron transfer between complexes I and III (CI, CIII) is mediated by channelling of Coenzyme Q (Q), with a kinetic advantage on the transfer based on random collisions, whereas electron transfer from CII to CIII obeys to the random collision model. The evidence for Q channelling, however, is highly controversial [1, 2]. We have approached the problem in bovine heart submitochondrial particles and in reconstituted proteoliposomes in which CI and CIII are preserved as SC I1III2. We restricted electron transfer to the Q area by studying NADH and succinate oxidation by exogenous cytochrome c (cyt. c) as acceptor, thus avoiding the bottleneck of endogenous cyt. c. Using this system we found the rates of NADH and succinate oxidation by cyt. c to be almost completely additive. The rate obtained by simultaneous addition of NADH and succinate was much higher than that predicted for a homogeneous Q pool [3], thus suggesting that NADH and succinate oxidation by cyt. c follow two different routes. The NADH route presumably operates through Q channelling in the SC I1III2. However Qpool molecules may exchange with Qbound in SC, approaching the rates predicted for a single pool, when the reducing pressure increases by strong CIII inhibition or when detergents destabilize the SCs. The accessibility of Qpool to SC I1III2 may be a physiological device to control electron fluxes from different substrates and implies a dissociation equilibrium of Qbound with the Q pool, by which the size of the pool determines saturation of the binding site(s) in the SC. Thus bulk Qpool has a role also in oxidation of NAD-linked substrates, providing a rationale for the beneficial effect of exogenous Q supplementation on mitochondrial bioenergetics. References 1. JN Blaza et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111 (2014) 15735-40. 2. G Lenaz et al. BBA Bioenerg. (2016) Epub ahead of print. 3. A Kröger, M Klingenberg. Eur J Biochem. 34 (1973) 358-68
    corecore