117,241 research outputs found
wee gee
wee gee n,v"Did you see him wee-gee around?" Explanation: turn hastily.turn hastilyYesDNE-citJ. D. A. WIDDOWSON COLLECTOR'S PERMANENT FILEUsed IUsed IUsed
author-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 – Supplemental material for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct
Supplemental material, author-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct by George Wood, Daria Roithmayr and Andrew V. Papachristos in Socius</p
Zobecněné odhadovací rovnice (GEE)
V tejto práci sa zaoberáme zovšeobecnenými odhadovacími rovnicami (GEE). Najskôr zavádzame pojem zovšeobecneného lineárneho modelu, na ktorom sú zovšeobecnené odha- dovacie rovnice postavené. Ďalej sú predstavené metódy pseudo maximálnej vierohodnosti a kvázi pseudo maximálnej vierohodnosti, z ktorých prechádzame k metóde zovšeobec- nených odhadovacích rovníc. Na záver sú prevedené simulačné štúdie, ktoré demonštrujú teoretické výsledky uvedené v práci. 1In this thesis we are interested in generalized estimating equations (GEE). First, we introduce the term of generalized linear model, on which generalized estimating equations are based. Next we present the methos of pseudo maximum likelyhood and quasi-pseudo maximum likelyhood, from which we move on to the methods of generalized estimating equations. Finally, we perform simulation studies, which demonstrates the theoretical results presented in the thesis. 1Katedra pravděpodobnosti a matematické statistikyDepartment of Probability and Mathematical StatisticsFaculty of Mathematics and PhysicsMatematicko-fyzikální fakult
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Germe d'une industrie de la pierre en Amérique
Mac Gee W. J. Germe d'une industrie de la pierre en Amérique. In: Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, V° Série. Tome 3, 1902. pp. 82-88
Unprecedented: Asian Americans, Harvard, the University of North Carolina, and the Supreme Court’s Striking Down of Affirmative Action
In response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Petitioner v. University of North Carolina, et al. (“SFFA v. Harvard”),1 author Harvey Gee urges his fellow Asian Americans––the star plaintiffs in the case and depicted as the main beneficiaries of its holdings–– to fight back to preserve affirmative action. Part I explores how the Court’s approach to affirmative action changed from the emergence of the Civil Rights Movement through many of the pivotal affirmative action cases prior to the 2010s. Part II then seeks to contextualize the struggle over the role of affirmative action within the Asian American community. It delves into two core mythologies that haunt these discussions––the Perpetual Foreigner Myth and the Model Minority Myth. Readers need a basic understanding of these mythologies because Part III focuses on Fisher v. University of Texas: a case that illustrates how activists and one dubiously sympathetic Justice would later tokenize Asian Americans in their efforts to dismantle affirmative action. Part IV dives into SFFA v. Harvard itself to show how the Court discarded affirmative action precedent and the arguments the dissenting Justices deployed to point out the decision’s weaknesses. Finally, the article ends by advocating for interracial solidatry to resist further attacks on the hallmark achievements of the Civil Rights Movement
- …
