1,723,292 research outputs found

    Gao, Z.

    No full text

    Gao, Z

    No full text

    An active disturbance rejection control approach for decentralized tracking in interconnected systems

    No full text
    In this article, an Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) approach is proposed for the robust decentralized solution of local trajectory tracking control problems on the part of agents acting on a complex interconnection of nonlinear subsystems. The key idea is that each agent regards all the nonlinear uncertainties arising from: 1) unknown state dependent nonlinearities of his own subsystem, 2) the environmental exogenous effects and 3) the rest of influences of the network dynamics, as a lumped, unstructured, timevarying uncertainty that perturbs the agent’s subsystem local dynamics. The ADRC approach allows to estimate this complex local interaction function and proceeds to cancel it from each individual subsystem dynamics facilitating the accomplishment of the individual control objectives. Simple but significant illustrative examples are presented where two interconnected DC to DC power converters serve a common or individual uncertain load while trying to independently track a prescribed output voltage reference trajectory in a decentralized manner

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore