1,720,977 research outputs found

    ANALYTICAL ROUTE FOR HYDROGEOLOGICAL ANOMALIES: THE CASE OF A “WHITE” SPRING IN MINE VALLEY (LIVIGNO – ITALY)

    No full text
    The Livigno area represents a good test for the groundwater system reconstruction in the mountain environment because it has a complex geological and tectonical setting. In order to characterize this aquifer, a multidisciplinary approach, based on lithological, geochemical, hydrogeological and geo-structural methods, has been adopted. The Livigno area is located at 1800 m s.l.m. in the central Alps (northern Lombardy – Italy). For the tectonic setting this area is comprise between the Err Bernina system (Lower Australpine) and the Ortles-Quatervals system (Upper Austroalpine). The most important regional fault is represented by Zebrù fault. This fault divides the sedimentary rocks constituted by Fraele and Monte Motto limestone (Lias) to crystalline basement, which is constituted by “Bormio phyllades” and “Punta Rossa Formation”. To the north of Zebru fault system the Alpisella fault system outcrops and divides the Monte Motto limestone by Triassic dolomites and limestones. In the Livigno area 32 springs were sampled and analyzed. In particular, in the Mine Valley (in the south part of the Livigno area) there is a peculiar spring, named “White”, which shows a peculiar unknown whitish deposition. The first step was to characterize that compound through the integration of several analytical techniques: XRD, SEM-EDX, FTIR, ICP-MS. Using this approach we tried to have a complete picture of the problem, also matching results with hydro-geochemical information. Via the elemental analysis with EDX was identified the presence of aluminum, sulfur, oxygen and silicon. Subsequent analysis and bibliographic documentations [1] allowed us to identify the following structure tridecameric of Na[Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12] (SO4)4 x 13H2O, and detect an anomaly in the presence of rare earth elements (REE) in the whitish compound. The second step was to analyze closely at Livigno water, which confirmed this peculiarity in REE in the “White” spring. [1] I.N. Bhattacharya, P.K. Gochhayat, P.S. Mukherjee, S. Paul, P.K. Mitra, Materials Chemistry and Physics 88 (2004) 32–40

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore