1,721,113 research outputs found
Intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasound adds some important details to the endovascular aortic aneurysm repair completion control
No full textBACKGROUND:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for early detection of endoleaks (ELs) during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with completion digital subtraction angiography.
METHODS:
Patients undergoing elective EVAR from January 2017 to April 2018 were consecutively enrolled in this prospective study. After endograft deployment, two-digital subtraction angiography (2DSA) with orthogonal C-arm angulations (anteroposterior and sagittal view) were routinely performed. After the endovascular treatment of clear, high-flow type I/III ELs detected by 2DSA, intraoperative CEUS was carried out in sterile conditions on the surgical field before guidewire removal. Presence and type of EL were evaluated with 2DSA and CEUS. CEUS was performed with the vascular surgeon blinded to the 2DSA findings. The primary end point was the level of agreement between 2DSA and CEUS to detect any type of EL and type II EL. Agreement between two diagnostic methods was calculated using Cohen's kappa. The secondary end point was utility of CEUS for intraoperative adjunctive procedure guidance.
RESULTS:
Sixty patients were enrolled (mean age, 78 ± 6 years; 90% male). 2DSA revealed 11 ELs (18%; 1 type IA, 10 type II), and CEUS 25 ELs (42%; 2 type IA, 23 type II). 2DSA and CEUS were in agreement in 39 cases (65%; 32 no ELs, 7 type II ELs). CEUS detected 17 ELs not identified by 2DSA (28%; 2 type IA, 15 type II); 2DSA detected three ELs not identified by CEUS (5%; 3 type II). In one case, 2DSA and CEUS detected type II and type IA ELs, respectively. For EL and type II EL detection, Cohen's kappa was 0.255 and 0.250, respectively (both "fair agreement"). Intraoperative adjunctive sac embolization was performed under CEUS control in 4 cases and technical success was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS:
Intraoperative CEUS during EVAR is feasible and can detect a greater number of ELs than 2DSA, in particular type II ELs. Further studies are necessary to assess the reliability of this intraoperative diagnostic examination. In type II ELs, CEUS may represent an additional, useful tool for intraoperative sac embolization guidance
Carotid disease. Clinical and morphological insights
No full texttHIS BOOK IS THE RESULT OF THE WORK OF MANY OF THE MOST RENOWNED EXPERTS IN THE FIELD, IN AN EFFORT TO SUMMARZE AND ASSESS THE CONTEMPORARY KNOWLEDGE ON THE PATHOLOGY
Iliac “paving & cracking” technique for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
No full textChallenging femoral/iliac access (CA) can lead to vascular complications which can hamper the clinical benefit of transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this sense, iliac artery rupture is a severe complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report a case of TF-TAVI managed with the "paving and cracking technique" to overcome CA
Proximal aortic neck angle does not affect early and late EVAR outcomes: an AnacondaTM Italian Registry analysis.
No full textAIM:
The aim of this paper was to evaluate early and 3-year results of the endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using the AnacondaTM endograft in patients with severe proximal aortic neck angle.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis of the AnacondaTM Italian Registry was carried out. Two groups of patients were identified according to the presence of a severe (Group A, GA: ≥ 60°) or an absent (Group B, GB: <45°) proximal aortic neck angle. Preoperative, procedural and follow-up data were evaluated. Mortality, proximal type I endoleak, freedom from iliac leg thrombosis and conversion to open repair were analyzed at 30-day and 3-year follow-up. The results of GA and GB were compared.
RESULTS:
From 2005 to 2012, 1030 patients were enrolled in the Registry. Sixty-five patients (6.3%) were included in GA and 737 (71.5%) in GB. The mean age and AAA diameter were respectively 76.8 years and 62.7 mm in GA and 77.2 years and 56.5 mm in GB (P=NS). The ASA ≥ 3 was reported in the 95.3% of GA vs. 81% of GB (P=0.005). The endograft main-body was repositioned in 35% of cases in GA and 20.7% in GB (P=0.008); there were no differences in the main-body ballooning and proximal aortic cuff placement. There were no statistical differences in 30-day mortality (GA 1.5% vs. GB 1.3%), proximal type I endoleaks (GA 1.5% vs. GB 0.8%), iliac leg thrombosis (GA 1.5% vs. GB 1.4%) and conversion to open repair (GA 3% vs. GB 0.6%). The 3-year survival was 95.4% in GA and 94.7% in GB (P=NS). Freedom from proximal type I endoleak, iliac leg thrombosis and conversion to open repair were respectively 98.5%, 95.4%, and 95.4% in GA and 97.8%, 96.9%, and 98.5% in GB (P=NS).
CONCLUSION:
The AnacondaTM Italian Registry reports good results in terms of clinical success at 3-year follow-up. AAA with severe proximal aortic neck can be treated with similar outcomes to AAA with favorable neck anatomy. The endograft repositionability is a benefit in cases with severe neck angle
Proximal Aortic Coverage and Clinical Results of the Endovascular Repair of Juxta-/Para-renal and Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm with Custom-made Fenestrated Endografts
No full textBACKGROUND: Juxta-renal (JAAA)/para-renal (PAAA) and type IV-thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aneurysms can be repaired by custom-made fenestrated endografts (CM-FEVAR). Differently from open repair, a relatively long segment of healthy proximal aorta needs to be covered to achieve a durable sealing, and this may be considered a disadvantage of the endovascular approach. We aimed to quantify the additional proximal aortic coverage in JAAAs, PAAAs, and type-IV TAAAs treated with CM-FEVAR and to evaluate its impact on early/follow-up clinical outcomes.METHODS: Between 2006 and 2018, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of JAAAs, PAAAs, and type-IV TAAAs submitted to CM-FEVAR were collected. The length of proximal healthy aortic coverage was evaluated on the preoperative endograft planning as the distance between the top of the CM-FEVAR endograft and the hypothetical level of aortic cross-clamping in case of open repair (type-IV TAAA-above the celiac trunk; PAAA-above the superior mesenteric artery; JAAA-above the lowest renal artery). Spinal cord ischemia (SCI), bowel ischemia (BI), renal function worsening (RFW) (estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction>25% of the baseline level - RFW), and mortality were assessed at 30-day. Survival, target visceral vessel (TVV) patency, and freedom from reinterventions (FFRs) were assessed during follow-up by Kaplan-Meier analysis R2.RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven cases were submitted to CM-FEVAR, for 72 (49%) JAAAs, 46 (31%) PAAAs, and 29 (20%) type IV-TAAAs, with 1(4-3%), 2 (28-19%), 3 (48-33%), and 4 (67-45%) fenestrations. JAAAs required a fenestration+bridging stent graft for the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk, in 46(64%) and 24(33%) cases, respectively. Nineteen (41%) PAAAs required a fenestration+bridging stent graft for the celiac trunk. The mean proximal additional aortic coverage was 48 ± 2mm with no differences among JAAAs (52 ± 1mm), PAAAs (42 ± 2mm), and type IV-TAAAs (50 ± 2mm) (P.09). Technical success, defined as correct endograft deployment, with TVV patency, absence of type I-III endoleaks, iliac leg stenosis/occlusions, open surgical conversion, and 24-hour mortality, was achieved in 98% of cases. Failures occurred for 1 type-III endoleak (type-IV TAAA) and 2 renal artery losses (PAAA and type IV-TAAA). The only case of SCI (0.7%) occurred in a type-IV TAAA where the proximal healthy aortic coverage was 80mm. One BI was caused by acute thrombosis of the bridging stent graft for the superior mesenteric artery at 24hours in 1 type IV-TAAA (0.7%). Thirty-five patients (24%) suffered postoperative RFW and required hemodialysis in 1 (0.7%) JAAA with severe preoperative chronic renal failure. There was no difference of proximal additional aortic coverage between patients with (49±29mm) and without (48±23mm) RFW (P.2). The 30-day mortality was 1.4%. The mean follow-up was 37 ± 2months with no cases of aneurysm-related late mortality. Survival was 94%, 89%, and 75% at 1, 2, and 5years, respectively. TVV patency was 97%, 97%, and 93% at 1, 2, and 5years, respectively. FFR was 98%, 95%, and 87% at 1, 2, and 5years, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Custom-made FEVAR requires a mean proximal additional aortic coverage of 48 ± 2mm above the level of hypothetical aortic cross-clamping in case of open repair. This aspect should be considered for CM-FEVAR indication in JAAAs, PAAAs, and type-IV TAAAs; nevertheless, it does not appear to be associated with negative early and follow-up clinical sequelae
Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†
No full textOur objective was to report the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with endografts
Impact of cerebral ischemic lesions on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy
Full text linkPatients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) are commonly defined as asymptomatic or symptomatic according with their neurological conditions, however, emerging evidences suggest stratifying patients according also with the presence of cerebral ischemic lesions (CIL). In asymptomatic patients, the presence of CIL increases the risk of future neurologic event from 1% to 4% per year, leading to a stronger indication to carotid revascularization. In symptomatic patients, the presence of CIL does not seem to influence the outcome of the carotid revascularization if the volume of the lesion is small (<4,000 mm(3)); the benefit of the revascularization is also more significant if performed within 2 weeks from the index event. However, high volume (>4,000 mm(3)) CIL are associated in some experiences with a higher risk of carotid revascularization suggesting to delay the carotid revascularization for at least 4 weeks. As a matter of fact, the evaluation of CIL dimensions and characteristics in patients with CAS gives to the physician involved in the treatment a valuable adjunctive tool in the choice of the ideal treatment
The detrimental impact of silent cerebral infarcts on asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy outcome
No full textBackground Silent cerebral infarctions (SCIs) can be identified by preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with severe carotid stenosis being considered for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It is unknown whether this finding has any effect on perioperative complications or long-term outcome. This study investigates the influence of SCI on early and late complications in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. Methods All consecutive CEAs undertaken for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis from 2005 to 2013 were retrospectively evaluated for clinical and anatomic characteristics. SCI was defined as cerebral embolic infarcts in the anterior or middle cerebral artery territory, ipsilateral to the target carotid stenosis, identified on preoperative CT. The end points of the study were to compare the 30-day and long-term stroke and death rate after CEA in patients with and without SCI. All patients were followed yearly through duplex ultrasonography and clinical assessment. Statistical methods used were Cox regression (hazard ratio) and Kaplan-Meier for life-table analysis. Results A total of 743 CEAs were performed in asymptomatic patients during the study period of which all had CT scans, and 97 (13.1%) demonstrated SCI. All patient stroke and death outcomes at 30 days were 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Patients with SCI had a significantly higher 30-day stroke outcome (3.1% vs 0.2%; P =.001; odds ratio, 16.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-201.4; P =.02) but not death or stroke/death outcome (0% vs 0.8%; P =.19 and 3.1% vs 0.9%, P =.06, respectively) compared with those without SCI. In addition, at a mean follow-up of 44.3 ± 23.9 months, the patients with SCI had a significantly worse 5-year ipsilateral stroke or any stroke-/death-free survival compared with patients without SCI (86.7% vs 99.0%; P =.001; and 76.9% vs 87.7%; P =.004). SCI was confirmed as an independent predictor of late any stroke/death by Cox regression (hazard ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-4.67; P =.006). Conclusions Patients who have SCI in the presence of severe carotid stenosis and undergo CEA have significantly worse perioperative stroke and long-term stroke/death outcomes. This data would suggest that asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA who have CT scan evidence of a cerebral infarct have worse prognosis than those with normal CT scans
Impact of acute cerebral ischemic lesions and their volume on the revascularization outcome of symptomatic carotid stenosis
No full textBackground The influence of acute cerebral ischemic lesions (CILs) on the revascularization outcome of symptomatic carotid stenosis has been scarcely investigated in the literature. This study evaluated the effect of CILs and their volume on the results of carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients. Methods All patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) between 2005 and 2014 were considered. CILs ipsilateral to the stenosis were identified in the preoperative cerebral computed tomography. The volume was quantified in mm3 and correlated with 30-day rates of stroke and stroke/death by χ2, multivariate analysis, Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results A total of 489 symptomatic patients were treated by CEA (327 [67%]) or CAS (162 [33%]), 186 (38%) ≤2 weeks and 303 (62%) >2 weeks from symptom onset. CEA and CAS patients had statistically similar rates of stroke (3.3% vs 5.5%; P = .27) and stroke/death (3.8% vs 5.9%; P = .22). CILs were identified in 251 patients (53%) and were associated with similar stroke and stroke/death rate compared with patients without CIL (12 [4.8%] vs 8 [3.5%], P = .46; and 14 [5.6%] vs 8 [3.5%]; P = .26, respectively). The median CIL volume was 1000 mm3 (interquartile range [IQR], 7000 mm3). Patients with postoperative stroke and stroke/death had a significantly higher preoperative CIL volume of 5100 mm3 (IQR, 31,000 mm3) vs 1000 mm3 (IQR, 7000 mm3; P = .01) and 4500 mm3 (IQR, 17,450 mm3) vs 1000 mm3 (IQR, 7000 mm3; P = .03), respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a volume of 4000 mm3 was predictive of postoperative stroke with 75% sensitivity and 63% specificity. A CIL volume ≥4000 mm3 was an independent risk factor for postoperative stroke, with a stroke rate of 9.3% (n = 9) vs 1.9% (n = 3) for a CIL volume of <4000 mm3 (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-19.1; P = .03). Conclusions CIL volume in symptomatic carotid stenosis seems to influence the 30-day outcome independently from the timing of carotid revascularization. A CIL volume of ≥4000 mm3 could be considered a significant predictor for postoperative stroke after carotid revascularization
- …
