1,721,126 research outputs found
Irene Gallica, Hoc est, De Pace Et Concordia In Galli[i]s Sancita, auspiciis Heinrici IV. Galliarum Et Navarrae Regis
Full text linkIRENE GALLICA, HOC EST, DE PACE ET CONCORDIA IN GALLI[I]S SANCITA, AUSPICIIS HEINRICI IV. GALLIARUM ET NAVARRAE REGIS
Irene Gallica, Hoc est, De Pace Et Concordia In Galli[i]s Sancita, auspiciis Heinrici IV. Galliarum Et Navarrae Regis ([1])
Titelseite ([1])
Widmung ([2])
Irene ad Gallos, ... (5)
Kolophon ([1]
Comparison of power and repeated sprint characteristics in female ultimate frisbee players of different levels and playing roles
No full textImagery and action observation training as a mean to improve motivation towards resistance training in elite female ultimate frisbee players
No full textRepeated-sprint ability training in ultimate frisbee players: comparison between two mesocycle periodization models
No full textEffect of sprint training using a surgical mask on repeated-sprint ability in ultimate frisbee players
Full text linkEffects of a 6-week detraining on repeated-sprint ability and power in competitive ultimate players
No full textEffects of 8-week resistance training on lower-limb power in male and female competitive ultimate frisbee players
No full text
Relationships between perceived exertion and game performance indicators in women’s ultimate frisbee
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
