1,720,964 research outputs found
Mechanisms of auditory impairment during acoustic neuroma surgery
No full textHearing loss during removal of acoustic neuroma (AN) may be due to labyrinthine and/or neural and/or vascular damage. Surgical maneuvers relating to perioperative and postoperative hearing may give rise to mechanisms of auditory impairment. Recording action potentials from the intracranial portion of the cochlear nerve (CN) has proven particularly useful for identifying the mechanisms of iatrogenic auditory injury. In this paper intraoperative and postoperative auditory impairments are investigated in relation to surgical steps in a group of 47 subjects with AN (size ranging from 5 to 25 mm) undergoing removal by a retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach. Drilling of the internal auditory canal (IAC), removal of the AN from the IAC fundus, coagulation close to the CN, lateral to medial tumor traction, separation of the CN from the facial nerve, and stretching of the CN have proven to be the most critical surgical steps in hearing preservation. On the other hand, maneuvers such as intracapsular tumor removal, vestibular neurectomy, suction close to the AN, and closure of the IAC defect did not correlate with changes in auditory potentials. Predisposing factors to postoperative hearing deterioration were IAC enlargement greater than 3 mm, IAC tumor size greater than 7 mm, extracanalar tumor size greater than 20 mm, labyrinth medial to the IAC fundus, severe involvement of the CN in the IAC, preoperative abnormal auditory brainstem responses, and normal vestibular reflectivity. Age and preoperative hearing did not prove to be statistically related to postoperative hearing. The variations in morphology and latency of CNAPs are discussed in relation to the mechanisms of iatrogenic injury
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Electrocochleography during cochlear implantation for hearing preservation
No full textOBJECTIVE:
To determine whether intraoperative electrocochleography during cochlear implant surgery provides online feedback to modify surgical procedure, reduce trauma, and increase preservation of residual hearing.
STUDY DESIGN:
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING:
Tertiary referral center, Otolaryngology Department, University of Verona.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
Twenty-seven adult patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery who had low- to mid-frequency (0.25-2 kHz) auditory thresholds measured preoperatively were enrolled. Fifteen subjects had compound action potentials measured to assess cochlear function during surgery. In those patients, surgery was modified according to electrocochleographic feedback. Twelve control subjects underwent cochlear implant surgery with blinded electrocochleographic monitoring.
RESULTS:
The average preoperative pure-tone audiometry thresholds (0.25-2 kHz) were 74.3 ± 10.2 and 81.5 ± 12.7 dB hearing level (HL) in the electrocochleographic feedback and control cohorts, respectively (P > .05). Compound action potential recordings showed a mean maximum latency shift of 0.63 ± 0.36 ms and normalized amplitude deterioration of 59% ± 19% during surgery. All of these changes reverted to normal after electrode insertion in all but 1 subject in the electrocochleographic feedback group. The average shifts in postoperative pure-tone average threshold (0.25-2 kHz), evaluated before activation, were 8.7 ± 4.3 and 19.2 ± 11.4 dB HL in the electrocochleographic feedback and control cohorts, respectively (P = .0051). Complete hearing preservation (loss of ≤10 dB) at 1 month before activation was achieved in 85% (11/13) of electrocochleographic feedback subjects and in 33% (4/12) of control patients (P = .0154).
CONCLUSION:
Monitoring cochlear function with electrocochleography gives real-time feedback during surgery, providing objective data that might help in modifying the surgical technique in ways that can improve the rate of hearing preservation
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
