1,720,977 research outputs found
Metodologia per la determinazione con alta precisione del dislivello esistente tra due punti nell’attraversamento di zone impraticabili
Evaluation of the serum markers CEA, NSE, TPS and CYFRA 21.1 in lung cancer.
We investigated the role of tumor markers CEA, NSE, TPS and CYFRA 21.1 in lung cancer diagnosis and staging in 169 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer (43 SCLC and 126 NSCLC). In SCLC patients NSE and CYFRA 21.1 showed the highest sensitivity and their combination improve significantly the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy. In NSCLC patients CYFRA 21.1 showed the highest sensitivity and global accuracy and no markers association was as effective as CYFRA 21.1 alone. Based on data from our study it can be concluded that in patients with suspected lung cancer the serum NSE and CYFRA 21.1 assay is a suitable association to confirm the clinical hypothesis. NSE in SCLC and CYFRA 21.1 in NSCLC are useful in the evaluation of disease extent and successive treatment planning
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (tps) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21.1) immunoradiometric assay in non small cell lung cancer evaluation.
The aim of our work was the evaluation of the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) of two cytokeratinic markers, TPS and CYFRA 21.1, in clinical setting on non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Serum samples were obtained from 148 untreated NSCLC patients, 60 patients with non malignant lung diseases and 100 healthy subjects: TPS and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels were assayed by IRMA methods. Diagnostic performance of the markers was evaluated and the TPS and CYFRA 21.1 distribution analysed according to some different clinical and biological variables as histological subtypes, stage and survival time by using the Mann-Whitney "U"-test. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.54 (80/148), 0.47 (28/60), 0.52 (108/208) and 0.73 (108/148), 0.74 (44/60), and 0.73 (152/208) for TPS and CYFRA 21.1 respectively. CYFRA 21.1 demonstrate a higher sensitivity than TPS in all stages of the disease and in the spinocellular and adenocarcinoma histological subtypes while TPS sensibility is higher in large cell carcinoma. The CYFRA 21.1 specificity is better than TPS probably by reason of its preferential distribution in respiratory epithelium. Both markers serum levels differ significantly between Stage I-II and IV and between Stage I-II-IIIa and IIIb-IV but neither TPS nor CYFRA 21.1 can discriminate Stage IIIa from IIIb. No significant differences were found in the serum expression of the markers by the different histological subtypes. A value of both markers less than the selected cut-off is related to a longer survival of the patients apart from therapy (p < 0.05). Our conclusion supports similar behaviour of these markers in NSCLC and indicates CYFRA 21.1 as the more needed biochemical index to evaluate NSCLC patients
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Semi-quantitative assessment of 99Tcm-sestamibi uptake in lung cancer: relationship with clinical response to chemoterapy
The objectives of this study were to measure semi-quantitatively uptake of 99Tcm-sestamibi (99Tcm-MIBI) by tumour tissue in patients with lung cancer and to investigate its relationship with clinical response to chemotherapy. 99Tcm-MIBI single photon emission tomography was performed at the time of diagnosis in 31 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer (19 small cell carcinomas, 12 non-small cell carcinomas), all of whom were undergoing chemotherapy. Fifteen patients were also investigated 2 weeks after the first and third cycles of chemotherapy. To quantify 99Tcm-MIBI uptake, a tumour/lung (T/L) ratio was calculated for the tomographic slices. The response to chemotherapy was rated as complete remission, partial remission or no remission using dimensional criteria. The results were expressed as the median and inter-quartile range; non-parametric statistical analyses were used. Forty one neoplastic localizations (31 primary tumours and 10 hilar or mediastinal lymph node masses) were assessed. The median T/L ratio of the primary tumours was 1.85 (range 1.7-2.4). Patients with a different response to chemotherapy had a significantly different median T/L ratio before chemotherapy: complete remission (n = 8), T/L ratio = 2.95 (range 2.20-3.25); partial remission (n = 10), 2.15 (range 1.77-2.40); no remission (n = 13), 1.70 (range 1.47-1.75) (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.0001). A T/L ratio of 1.80 gave sensitivity of 83\%, specificity of 85\% and accuracy of 84\% in the prediction of the response to chemotherapy. The patients with small cell carcinomas demonstrated greater 99Tcm-MIBI uptake than those with non-small cell carcinomas: T/L ratio, median 2.30 (range 1.76-3.00) vs 1.70 (range 1.50-1.78) (Mann-Whitney U-test, P = 0.001). No significant difference in 99Tcm-MIBI uptake was observed between the 10 lymph node metastases and the corresponding primary tumours: T/L ratio, median 2.30 (range 1.75-2.50) vs 2.15 (1.77-3.00) (Wilcoxon's paired samples rank test, N.S.). Of the 15 patients who were monitored with scintigraphy during chemotherapy, 10 showed complete or partial remission and a parallel reduction in their T/L ratio. The other five patients showed no response to chemotherapy and their T/L ratio was either unaffected or increased. We conclude that the semi-quantitative assessment of 99Tcm-MIBI uptake may have a significant role to play in the management of lung cancer, providing an effective means of predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy and of selecting subgroups of patients requiring radiotherapy or combined protocols before the start of treatment. 99Tcm-MIBI imaging may also be of use in monitoring clinical response to chemotherapy
- …
