1,721,101 research outputs found
G. Macchia, Elogio della luce. Incontri fra le arti. Milano, Adelphi, 1990. 280 pages, 20 illustrations.
No full textCaracciolo Arizzoli Maria-Teresa. G. Macchia, Elogio della luce. Incontri fra le arti. Milano, Adelphi, 1990. 280 pages, 20 illustrations.. In: Revue de l'Art, 1992, n°96. p. 88
Recensione di “Giuliano Torrengo, I viaggi nel tempo, Laterza, Bari”,
No full textIl libro di Torrengo è un'ottima introduzione al problema metafisico dei viaggi nel tempo. E' però troppo poco attento agli aspetti scientifici della questione
Corrado Rosso, Illumlnismo, Félicita, Dolore. Miti e Ideologie francesi. (Collana di Saggi diretta da G. Macchia, XXXIII) 1969
No full textFavre Robert. Corrado Rosso, Illumlnismo, Félicita, Dolore. Miti e Ideologie francesi. (Collana di Saggi diretta da G. Macchia, XXXIII) 1969. In: Dix-huitième Siècle, n°3, 1971. pp. 409-410
Quintino Cataudella, La Novella Greca. Prolegomeni e testi in traduzioni originali (Collana di Antologie diretta da G. Macchia, III), 1956
No full textBompaire J. Quintino Cataudella, La Novella Greca. Prolegomeni e testi in traduzioni originali (Collana di Antologie diretta da G. Macchia, III), 1956. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 60, 1958, n°3-4. pp. 449-454
How contemporary cosmology bypasses Kantian prohibition against a science of the universe
No full textIt is well-known that Kant, in the Critique of Pure Reason , discusses explicitly the conceptual limitations, to which all our cosmological speculations are subjected. He suggests that the universe as a whole, the object of cosmological explanation, is not an object of possible experience, and, consequently, of knowledge; whence his renunciation to a cosmology as a science, to a rational cosmology that can explain the cosmos in its totality. His meditations on cosmology claim to prove that the ultimate basic questions potentially pertaining cosmology about universe – its finiteness in space, its origin in time – do not stand up to critical examination and are rationally insoluble: it is possible to give apparently cogent reasons to support opposite views in both questions, then one arrives to what seems a contradiction (the so-called cosmological antinomies), and neither answer can be definitely accepted.
But how does Kant reach this result and, above all, which is its epistemological effect on modern cosmology, on its scientific status, in particular in the light of cosmological principle, generally considered a cornerstone in history and in foundations of cosmology, and one of the fundamental tenets of its modern standard relativistic models
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A STRUCTURAL AND FOUNDATIONAL ANALYSIS OF EUCLID’S PLANE GEOMETRY: THE CASE STUDY OF CONTINUITY
No full text- …
