1,720,964 research outputs found
[Staging of lung cancer by computerized tomography: evaluation based on surgical experience]
No full text[A case of amputation neuroma of the bile duct following video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy]
No full text
[Surgical treatment of non-metastatic gastric GIST: two cases and review of the literature].
No full textGastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) represent an evolving field in oncological surgery and must be approached with specific prognostic and therapeutic criteria. In the GIST's suspicion the surgeon has to consider all the therapeutic possibilities, also for the impossibility to predict the biological behaviour and the aggressiveness of the tumor. The presence of a GIST has to be suspected in patients observed for gastrointestinal bleeding, when another pathology isn't demostrable. Surgical strategy must consider a limited resection as the best treatment, differently from what we do for adenocarcinoma. The extension of the resection can changes, regarding tumor volume and position, from extremely invasive surgery to laparoscopic operations with a partial removal of the gastric wall. Lymphadenectomy is not indicated because these tumors rarely spread to the nodes. We present the clinical case of two patients observed for gastrointestinal bleeding and with preoperative diagnostic suspicion of GIST, submitted to surgical resection. In the first case we performed a superior polar gastrectomy with esofago-gastric anastomosis for the mass proximity to the cardias. In the second patient the intervention has been a limited resection of the fundus of stomach including the tumor
Association of multiple granular cell tumors and squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: case report and review of the literature.
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
