5,357 research outputs found
Henry G. Graves & Sons receipt, number 33327
No full textThis is a receipt from a purchase made by Edward H. McCabe to Henry G. Graves & Sons, a mixed concrete company in Georgetown
Henry G. Graves & Sons receipt, number 33285
No full textThis is a receipt from a purchase made by Edward H. McCabe at Henry G. Graves & Sons, a mixed concrete company in Georgetown. The purchases include items such as lime and cement
Telegram from Fred A. McCabe to Amon G. Carter, Jr.
No full textTelegram from Fred A. McCabe of the United Press Dallas to Amon G. Carter, Jr. upon the death of Amon Giles Carter. The telegram expresses condolences about his death.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_meachamcarterpapers/1518/thumbnail.jp
Two-Dimensional Design: A Dutchess Community College Open Educational Resource, Updated Edition
No full textAn OER text for ART110 at Dutchess Community College. Written, illustrated, designed, and compiled by Holly McCabe. Updated version for Fall 2024.NASUNY DutchessPerforming, Visual Arts & CommunicationsN/
Three-Dimensional Design: A Dutchess Community College Open Educational Resource
No full textAn OER text for ART111, 3D-Design, at Dutchess Community College. Written, illustrated, designed, and compiled by Holly McCabe. Created for Fall 2024.NASUNY DutchessPerforming, Visual Arts & CommunicationsN/
Effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in community treatment of patients with psychosis - a cluster randomised controlled trial
No full textBackgroundLarge numbers of patients with psychosis have regular meetings with key clinicians in the community. There is little evidence on how these meetings should be conducted to be therapeutically effective. DIALOG, a computer mediated procedure, was shown to improve outcomes in a European multi-centre trial. DIALOG structures the patient-clinician communication and makes it patient-centred, but does not guide clinicians as to how to respond to patients’ concerns. DIALOG has been further developed into DIALOG+, which uses advanced software and, additionally, provides a four step approach - based on a solution focused model - for addressing patients’ concerns. We designed a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of DIALOG+ in improving treatment outcomes of patients with psychosis in the community.Methods/designKey workers are recruited from community mental health teams in East London and randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group. Out of their case loads, we identify patients with schizophrenia (F 20–29) and a moderate or lower level of subjective quality of life (MANSA score <5), who are treated according to the allocation of their key workers. Key workers in the intervention group are trained in using DIALOG+ and use it with each patient over a six-month period. Control patients rate their satisfaction with life and treatment on a tablet to control for the effect of regular ratings and the use of modern technology. We are recruiting up to 42 key workers to reach a total sample size of 180 patients. Clinical and social outcomes including costs are assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome is subjective quality-of-life at 6 months.DiscussionThe trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intervention (DIALOG+) which uses modern technology to support routine patient-clinician meetings in community care, makes the communication patient centred and guides patients and clinicians to address concerns. DIALOG+ is a generic and widely applicable intervention. If shown as effective, it can be used to improve outcomes of community care on a large scale, ensuring that routine encounters are therapeutically effective. DIALOG+ can also be implemented across services at relatively low additional costs
Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors
No full textLittle work has been done on academic dishonesty in the Middle East. This research investigates the nature of the relationship between contextual factors and academic dishonesty using a sample from three private universities in Lebanon, and compares the results to a sample from seven large universities in the US. Using the basic model of McCabe et al. (Research in Higher Education 43(3):357-378, 2002), we found additional evidence for the strong role perception of peers' behavior plays in understanding student decisions concerning academic integrity. Cross cultural comparisons of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding academic dishonesty were pivotal in this research. Our results support the view that Lebanese university students are strongly influenced by the norms of the collectivist society in which they are raised as compared to the more individualistic society found in the United States. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.Al-Harthi A. S., 2005, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V6, P1; Ayyash-Abdo H, 2001, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V29, P503, DOI 10.2224-sbp.2001.29.5.503; Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO; Buda R, 1998, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V29, P487, DOI 10.1177-0022022198293006; Chapman K. J., 2004, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V18, P425, DOI DOI 10.1108-09513540410563130; Christensen-Hughes J. M., 2006, CANADIAN J HIGHER ED, V36, P49; Cohen J, 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES; COHEN J, 1993, J BUS ETHICS, V12, P13, DOI 10.1007-BF01845782; Dalton J.C., 1985, PROMOTING VALUES DEV; DELAMBERT K., 2003, J AM ACAD BUSINESS, V3, P98; Diekhoff GM, 1999, RES HIGH EDUC, V40, P343, DOI 10.1023-A:1018703217828; DuPont AM, 1996, J BUS ETHICS, V15, P815, DOI 10.1007-BF00381850; FRANKLYNSTOKES A, 1995, STUD HIGH EDUC, V20, P159, DOI 10.1080-03075079512331381673; Gibbs J. P., 1975, CRIME PUNISHMENT DET; HARPP DN, 1993, J CHEM EDUC, V70, P306; Hofstede G. H., 1982, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE; JENDREK MP, 1989, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V30, P401; Kohlberg L., 1969, HDB SOCIALIZATION TH, P347; Leelakulthanit O., 1994, INT MARKET REV, V11, P65; Lim VKG, 2001, ETHICS BEHAV, V11, P261, DOI 10.1207-S15327019EB1103_5; Lupton R. A., 2000, J ED BUSINESS, V75, P231; LYSONSKI S, 1991, J BUS ETHICS, V10, P141, DOI 10.1007-BF00383617; Magnus JR, 2002, J ECON EDUC, V33, P125; MCCABE DL, 1997, RES HIGH EDUC, V38, P397; MCCABE DL, 1993, J HIGH EDUC, V64, P522, DOI 10.2307-2959991; McCabe DL, 2002, RES HIGH EDUC, V43, P357, DOI 10.1023-A:1014893102151; McCabe DL, 2006, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU, V5, P294; Michaels J. W., 1989, SOCIAL SCI Q, V70, P872; Newstead SE, 1996, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V88, P229; Nuss EM, 1984, IMPROVING COLLEGE U, V32, P140; Ogilby S. M., 1995, J ED BUSINESS, V71, P92; Pavela G., 2000, CHANGE, V33, P32; POWER FC, 1989, LAWRENCE KOHLBERGS A; Pulford BD, 2005, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V39, P727, DOI 10.1016-j.paid.2005.02.008; RALSTON DA, 1994, J BUS ETHICS, V13, P989, DOI 10.1007-BF00881669; ROSENHAN DL, 1976, MORAL DEV BEHAV, P241; Salter SB, 2001, J BUS ETHICS, V31, P37, DOI 10.1023-A:1010785106667; Sims R. L., 1993, J ED BUSINESS, V68, P207; SWIDAN Z, 2004, US INT BUSINESS REV, V13, P661; Swift C. O., 2001, J ED BUSINESS, V77, P69, DOI DOI 10.1080-08832320109599052; TITTLE CR, 1973, SOC PROBL, V20, P488, DOI 10.1525-sp.1973.20.4.03a00080; *TRANSP INT, 2005, TI CORR PERC IND CPI; TREVINO LK, 1994, J BUS ETHICS, V13, P405, DOI 10.1007-BF00881449; Triandis HC, 2001, J PERS, V69, P907, DOI 10.1111-1467-6494.696169; Underwood J, 2003, BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, V34, P467, DOI 10.1111-1467-8535.00343; Wilhelm PG, 2002, J BUS ETHICS, V35, P177, DOI 10.1023-A:1013882225402; *WORLD BANK, 2006, LEB Q UPD 2 QUART 20; Zimring F, 1973, DETERRENCE LEGAL THR19151
La sfida della co-creazione di valore nelle destinazioni turistiche: una proposta di analisi.
No full textRecommended from our members
The threat ::how the FBI protects America in the age of terror and Trump /
No full textOn March 16, 2018, just twenty-six hours before his scheduled retirement from the organization he had served with distinction for more than two decades, Andrew G. McCabe was fired from his position as deputy director of the FBI. President Donald Trump celebrated on Twitter: 'Andrew McCabe FIRED, a great day for the hard working men and women of the FBI--A great day for Democracy.' Now McCabe offers a dramatic and candid account of his career, and an impassioned defense of the FBI's integrity and independence in protecting America and upholding the Constitution. McCabe started as a street agent in the FBI's New York field office, serving under Director Louis Freeh. He became an expert in two kinds of investigations that are critical to American national security: Russian organized crime -- which is inextricably linked to the Russian state -- and terrorism. Under Director Robert Mueller, McCabe led the investigations of major attacks on American soil, including the Boston Marathon bombing, a plot to bomb the New York subways, and several narrowly averted bombings of aircraft. And under James Comey, McCabe was deeply involved in the controversial investigations of the Benghazi attack, the Clinton Foundation's activities, and Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server when she was secretary of state. He recounts in detail the time between Donald Trump's November 2016 election and his firing, set against a narrative spanning two decades when the FBI's mission shifted to a new goal: preventing terrorist attacks on Americans. But as McCabe shows, right now the greatest threat to the United States comes from within, as President Trump and his administration ignore the law, attack democratic institutions, degrade human rights, and undermine the U.S. Constitution that protects every citizen. McCabe tells the true story of what the FBI is, how it works, and why it will endure as an institution of integrity that protects America
- …
