128 research outputs found

    Polymeric glues in intestinal surgery

    No full text
    Authors reports the results of an experimental study on the usefulness of n-butil-2-cyanoacrylate in abdominal surgery. The research, performed on Wistar rats and Landrace pigs, is constituted by an early phase, to verify the tissutal reaction to the n-butil-2-cyano-acrylate and its adhesive properties, and a main phase, in which it was evaluated the efficacy of n-butil-2 cyano-acrylate as the only support or as an adjunct to the usual methods in intestinal synthesis. Istological and angiographic examination of the surgical specimens demonstrated the tissutal atoxicity and the good adhesive effect of the tissutal glue. Because of these characteristic, authors propose its employment to reinforce intestinal sutures performed with the usual methods in high risk condition

    The use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in high-risk intestinal anastomoses

    No full text
    The success of every intestinal surgical procedure primarily depends on correct technical execution of the intestinal sutures. Despite the continuing improvements in intestinal synthesis techniques and the introduction of mechanical staplers, the risk of anastomotic dehiscence remains a major concern. For high-risk anastomoses, defined as those performed under critical conditions, n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive allows for quick sealing of the two stumps and supports the physiological wound-healing process. Furthermore, no experimental or clinical studies have shown that this glue has any carcinogenic or mutagenic properties. Thus, we believe that n-butyl- 2-cyanoacrylate will be extremely useful for intestinal anastomoses with a high risk of dehiscence

    Emergency treatment of complicated colorectal cancer

    No full text
    Giovanni Domenico Tebala,1 Andrea Natili,1,2 Antonio Gallucci,1 Gioia Brachini,2 Abdul Qayyum Khan,1 Domenico Tebala,3 Andrea Mingoli2 1Colorectal Team, Noble’s Hospital, Strang, Douglas, Isle of Man, UK; 2Emergency Surgery Unit, “P.Valdoni” Department of Surgery, “Umberto I” University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 3National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), Catanzaro, Italy Aim: To find evidence to suggest the best approach in patients admitted as an emergency for complicated colorectal cancer.Methods: The medical records of 131 patients admitted as an emergency with an obstructing, perforated, or bleeding colorectal cancer to Noble’s Hospital, Isle of Man, and the Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided in 3 groups on the basis of the emergency treatment they received, namely 1) immediate resection, 2) damage control procedure and elective or semielective resection, and 3) no radical treatment. Demographic variables, clinical data, and treatment data were considered, and formed the basis for the comparison of groups. Primary endpoints were 90-day mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, number of lymph nodes analyzed, rate of radical R0 resections, and the number of patients who had chemoradiotherapy.Results: Forty-two patients did not have any radical treatment because the cancer was too advanced or they were too ill to tolerate an operation, 78 patients had immediate resection and 11 had damage control followed by elective resection. There was no statistically significant difference between immediate resections and 2-stage treatment in 90-day mortality and morbidity (mortality: 15.4% vs 0%; morbidity: 26.9% vs 27.3%), number of nodes retrieved (16.6±9.4 vs 14.9±5.7), and rate of R0 resections (84.6% vs 90.9%), but mortality was slightly higher in patients who underwent immediate resection. The patients who underwent staged treatment had a higher possibility of receiving a laparoscopic resection (11.5% vs 36.4%).Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate a clear superiority of one treatment with respect to the other, even if there is an interesting trend favoring staged resection. Keywords: colorectal cancer, colorectal surgery, obstructing colorectal cancer, perforated colorectal cancer, emergency surger

    State-of-the-art surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis

    No full text
    Background: In the last two decades, there has been a Copernican revolution in the decision-making for the treatment of Diverticular Disease. Purpose: This article provides a report on the state-of-the-art of surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis. Conclusion: Acute diverticulitis is the most common reason for colonic resection after cancer; in the last decade, the indication for surgical resection has become more and more infrequent also in emergency. Currently, emergency surgery is seldom indicated, mostly for severe abdominal infective complications. Nowadays, uncomplicated diverticulitis is the most frequent presentation of diverticular disease and it is usually approached with a conservative medical treatment. Non-Operative Management may be considered also for complicated diverticulitis with abdominal abscess. At present, there is consensus among experts that the hemodynamic response to the initial fluid resuscitation should guide the emergency surgical approach to patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. In hemodynamically stable patients, a laparoscopic approach is the first choice, and surgeons with advanced laparoscopic skills report advantages in terms of lower postoperative complication rates. At the moment, the so-called Hartmann’s procedure is only indicated in severe generalized peritonitis with metabolic derangement or in severely ill patients. Some authors suggested laparoscopic peritoneal lavage as a bridge to surgery or also as a definitive treatment without colonic resection in selected patients. In case of hemodynamic instability not responding to fluid resuscitation, an initial damage control surgery seems to be more attractive than a Hartmann’s procedure, and it is associated with a high rate of primary anastomosis

    Oral Antibiotics Alone versus Oral Antibiotics Combined with Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matching Re-Analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 Prospective Cohorts

    No full text
    The evidence regarding the role of oral antibiotics alone (oA) or combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MoABP) for elective colorectal surgery remains controversial. A prospective database of 8359 colorectal resections gathered over a 32-month period from 78 Italian surgical units (the iCral 2 and 3 studies), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables together with 60-day adverse events, was re-analyzed to identify a subgroup of 1013 cases (12.1%) that received either oA or MoABP. This dataset was analyzed using a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 243 patients each were obtained: group A (oA) and group B (MoABP). The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher AL risk [14 (5.8%) vs. 6 (2.5%) events; OR: 3.77; 95%CI: 1.22–11.67; p = 0.021], while no significant difference was recorded between the two groups regarding SSIs. These results strongly support the use of MoABP for elective colorectal resections

    The anionic peptide fraction is present on the gallbladder apical epithelium and favours biliary cholesterol absorption.

    No full text
    Abstract BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated (a) in vitro and in vivo the changes of biliary mass of the anionic peptide fraction, apolipoproteinA-I, immunoglobulin-A, albumin and cholesterol over time in the excluded gallbladder and (b) in vivo the localization in the gallbladder epithelium of the anionic peptide fraction and cholesterol absorbed from bile. METHODS: Native bile was substituted with pig bile containing radiolabeled cholesterol in the in vitro isolated intra-arterially perfused pig gallbladder (n=9) and in vivo in anestethized pigs with excluded gallbladders (n=6). The amount of cholesterol (scintillation counting) and proteins (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in gallbladder bile were measured over time. The localization of the anionic peptide fraction and cholesterol absorbed from bile in the gallbladder epithelium was studied in vivo by immunohistochemistry and fluoro-phospho-imager analysis. RESULTS: The rate of biliary cholesterol disappeared from bile was a function of the initial concentration and of the biliary mass changes over time of the anionic peptide fraction, but not of that of the other biliary proteins. The anionic peptide fraction colocalized with biliary cholesterol absorbed by the gallbladder on the apical side of gallbladder epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data indirectly suggest that biliary anionic peptide fraction could favour biliary cholesterol absorption by the gallbladder epithelium
    corecore