1,721,157 research outputs found
Figure. 1. A, Neochlamisus bebbianae IV in Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini)
No full textFigure. 1. A, Neochlamisus bebbianae IV: Acer (maple) host form coating her faeces on her eggs. B, egg case of Neochlamisus platani. C, third instar of Neochlamisus chamaedaphnes walking with its portable case. D, second instar of Neochlamisus bebbianae, Salix (willow) host form. All photos by CGB.Published as part of Chaboo, Caroline S., Brown, Christopher G. & Funk, Daniel J., 2008, Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini), pp. 315-351 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2) on page 316, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00343.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544681
Figure 16. Neochlamisus cribipennis. A in Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini)
No full textFigure 16. Neochlamisus cribipennis. A, larval instar III, live feeding on host plant leaf (photo by CGB). B, pupa attached to host leaf petiole (photo by CGB). C, instar-IV case, ventral suture split open. D, instar-IV case, wall cross-section showing trichome in faecal matrix, scanning electron micrograph.Published as part of Chaboo, Caroline S., Brown, Christopher G. & Funk, Daniel J., 2008, Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini), pp. 315-351 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2) on page 337, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00343.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544681
Figure 3. Neochlamisus bebbianae I in Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini)
No full textFigure 3. Neochlamisus bebbianae I: Salix bebbianae (willow) host form. A, case series from egg case (left) to pupal case (right). B, egg case, lateral aspect, scanning electron micrograph. C, egg case, scanning electron micrograph.Published as part of Chaboo, Caroline S., Brown, Christopher G. & Funk, Daniel J., 2008, Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini), pp. 315-351 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2) on page 320, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00343.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544681
Figure 12. Neochlamisus chamaedaphnes. A, adult habitus. B in Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini)
No full textFigure 12. Neochlamisus chamaedaphnes. A, adult habitus. B, case series from egg case (left) to pupal case (right). C–G, scanning electron micrographs. C, egg case, lateral aspect. D, egg case surface with trichomes. E, instar-I case, lateral aspect. F, instar-I case, egg section showing faecal plates. G, instar-I case, larval section with faecal rows.Published as part of Chaboo, Caroline S., Brown, Christopher G. & Funk, Daniel J., 2008, Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini), pp. 315-351 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2) on page 332, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00343.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544681
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Using the negative binomial distribution to investigate sports attendance
No full textMost of the research into sports attendance uses cognitive and hedonic models as the theoretical foundation. While these models are useful at explaining attendance variance, they are not good predictors of attendance. For frequently purchased consumer goods in stable markets, the study of past behaviour (habit) and the use of the negative binomial distribution (NBD) have been particulary effective in predicting penetration rates and frequence of buyers of a brand or category. This study compares sports attendace at football games with the attendance predicted by the NBD, and finds that attendance at professional football games follows the NBD when season ticket holders are removed from the sample
Figure 19. Neochlamisus platani. A in Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini)
No full textFigure 19. Neochlamisus platani. A, instar-II case, dorsal aspect. B, instar-III case, lateral aspect. C, instar-IV case, lateral aspect. D, larva, instar IV, lateral aspect. E–J, Scanning electron micrographs. E, instar-III case, forewall removed, internal aspect. F, instar-III case, forewall removed, internal surface with trichome. G, instar-IV case, external surface with stellate trichomes. H, instar-IV case, cross-section of wall showing trichome–faecal matrix. I, pupal case, crosssection of wall. J, Pupal case, cross-section near apex.Published as part of Chaboo, Caroline S., Brown, Christopher G. & Funk, Daniel J., 2008, Faecal case architecture in the gibbosus species group of Neochlamisus Karren, 1972 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae: Chlamisini), pp. 315-351 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152 (2) on page 341, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00343.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544681
- …
