1,720,967 research outputs found
Electrical conductivity depth modelling with a multireceiver EMI sensor for prospecting archaeological features
Abstract not availableTimothy Saey, Philippe De Smedt, Eef Meerschman, Mohammad Monirul Islam, Fun Meeuws, Ellen Van De Vijver, Alexander Lehouck, and Marc Van Meirvenn
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Location (GDA94) and major trace element concentrations in weight% of sampled Tertiary and Jurassic Tasmanian mafic rocks
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Table 5: Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes for Cenozoic mafic rocks in Tasmania and standards. * denotes standard reference values by (i) Elburg et al. (2005) (ii) Raczek et al. (2003) (iii
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Table 2: XRF trace element analyses in ppm for Cenozoic and Jurassic mafic rocks in Tasmania
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Raw trace element data of Cenozoic Tasmanian basalts measured by LA-ICP-MS on lithium tetra-borate fused disc
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Table 3: ICP-MS trace element analyses in ppm for Cenozoic and Jurassic mafic rocks in Tasmania. BCR-2* and BHVO-2* are certified and recommended reference value
Data for: Geochemical constraints on Cenozoic intraplate magmatism and their relation to Jurassic dolerites in Tasmania, using Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes
Table 6: Ar39/Ar40 analyses for selected sample
LA-ICP-MS trace element data on fused discs of Tasmanian basalts
Trace element data of Tasmanian basalts using LA-ICP-MS on lithium tetra-borate fused disc
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
