1,720,961 research outputs found
Evaluation of a model for total body protein mass based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with a reference four-component model
Get PDFThe aim of the present study was to evaluate a model of body composition for assessing total body protein (TBP) mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), with either measured or assumed total body water (TBW); it was intended to provide a less complex or demanding alternative technique to, for example, the four-component model (4-CM). The following measurements were obtained in healthy adults (n 46) aged 18–62 years, and children (n 30) aged 8–12 years: body weight (BWt), body volume (BV; under-water weighing), TBW (2H-dilution space or predicted using an assumed hydration fraction of fat-free mass (HFffm)), bone mineral content (BMC; DXA) and fat-free soft tissue (FFST; DXA). TBP was calculated using the 4-CM (TBP=3·050BWt-0·290TBW-2·734BMC-2·747BV) and the DXA model (TBP=FFST-0·2305BMC-TBW). DXA measurements were obtained using the Lunar DPX (Lunar Radiation Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) or Hologic QDR 1000/W (Hologic, Waltham, MA, USA). Precision of the DXA model for TBP with measured TBW (4·6–6·8 % mean TBP) was slightly worse than the 4-CM (4·0–5·4 %), whereas that modelled with assumed HFffm was more precise (2·4–5·2 %) because it obviated imprecision associated with measuring TBW. Agreement between the 4-CM and DXA model with measured TBW was also worse (e.g. bias, 15 % of the mean; 95 % limits of agreement up to ±39 % for adults measured on the Lunar DPX) than when a constant for HFffm was assumed (3·7 % and ±21 % respectively). Most of the variability in agreement between these various models was due to interpretation of biological factors, rather than to measurement imprecision. Therefore, the DXA model, which is less complex and demanding than the 4-CM, is of value for assessing TBP in groups of healthy subjects, but is of less value for individuals in whom there may be substantial differences from reference 4-CM estimates
Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis
No full textBackground: Most techniques for measuring body composition are based on 2-component models (2-CMs) and depend on assumptions relating to the constancy of the density (D-FFM) and hydration fraction (HFFFM) of fat-free mass (FFM). Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether these assumptions are systematically violated in patients with cirrhosis and to assess the validity of the estimates of body composition obtained in these patients by using 2-CM techniques. Design: Body composition was assessed by using a 4-component model (4-CM), which was based on data obtained from densitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in 20 patients with cirrhosis who had no evidence of fluid retention and in 20 pair-matched healthy control subjects. The results were compared with those obtained by using "reference" and "bedside" 2-CM techniques. Results: The mean (+/- SD) D-FFM was significantly lower in the patients with cirrhosis (1.091 +/- 0.008 compared with 1.100 +/- 0.006 kg/L; P < 0.001); no significant difference in HFFFM was observed between the patients and control subjects (74.5 +/- 2.6 compared with 73.5 +/- 2.1), although there was greater variability in the patients. Significant differences were observed in the body-composition variables obtained by using the "reference" 2-CM techniques compared with the 4-CM-the 95% limits of agreement in the patients with cirrhosis exceeded 5% body fat and 3 kg FFM; the corresponding values for the "bedside" 2-CM techniques were 11% body fat and 7.5 kg FFM. Conclusions: Assumptions relating to the constancy of the DFFM and HFFFM are violated in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, standard 2-CM techniques provide inaccurate body composition estimates in this patient populatio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
