1,721,151 research outputs found

    The fishery for Antarctic krill – conflicts between industrial production, protection of biodiversity, and legal governance

    No full text
    The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) is responsible for conserving the Antarctic marine ecosystem, where conservation also includes the management of commercial fisheries. The largest fishery (by weight) in Antarctic waters is that for Antarctic krill, a species vital to biogeochemical cycles and carbon sequestration, and a critical dietary item for a broad guild of marine predators. Fishing interests grew from the 1960s onwards, but catches then declined following the breakup of the Soviet Union. Now catches are again increasing, CCAMLR has been developing a revised krill fishery management framework intended to reduce ecosystem risks to predators at critical times of year. At the CCAMLR meeting in 2024, ongoing development of the revised framework was considered, however no progress was made. Progress is urgent, since part of the existing management approach was not renewed. Consequently, by default, catches in the southwest Atlantic may now aggregate in space and time; the interim catch limit for krill (620,000 t) can now be taken from anywhere and at any time, including at times and in places critical to krill predators, possibly with unintended consequences. Allowing catches to aggregate in space and time is something CCAMLR has long sought to avoid. Existing voluntary measures implemented by the fishery will help distribute catches, but are no substitute for de jure management. In addition to risks to the ecosystem, the current situation also presents risks for fishing nations and for CCAMLR itself. Rapid progress with the revised management framework now depends upon rebuilding consensus.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Using Tissue Biomarkers to Understand the Demography and Recovery of Baleen Whales in a Rapidly Changing Environment

    Full text link
    Baleen whale populations in the Southern Ocean are recovering after intense commercial whaling in the 20th century. Along the Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP), this recovery is occurring in one of the planet's most rapidly changing marine ecosystems. Understanding how climate-driven changes influence the population dynamics of whales in this region is critical for understanding what conservation and management actions must be prioritized to maintain the structure and function of this marine ecosystem. This is even more important as this region has seen extraordinary increases in industrial krill fishery pressure, which overlaps in both time and space with whales foraging in this region, as well as increased human presence in the form of ecotourism. Thus, to begin understanding the dynamics of whale recovery under continued environmental change, we need to study these whales' demography and population dynamics. My dissertation aimed to examine and describe the demographics and population dynamics of two species of Southern Hemisphere baleen whales (Antarctic minke whales and Southern Hemisphere humpback whales) in the context of a rapidly changing ecosystem. To do this, I used one of the most extensive, non-lethal tissue archives of these two species, collected as part of the National Science Foundations (NSF) Palmer Station long-term ecological research (LTER) project. I found that on average, Antarctic minke whales reproduced each year and estimated that two-thirds of females along the WAP were sexually mature. More importantly, these data represent the first non-lethal approach to studying this species. Furthermore, I found that broad-scale environmental variation affecting krill abundance and availability along the WAP adversely impacted humpback whale pregnancy rates. This indicates that continued warming along the WAP that results in subsequent changes in the distribution and abundance of prey may adversely affect the recovery of this humpback whale population. Lastly, I found that blubber cortisol levels were not significantly different between male and female humpback whales but were significantly different across different demographic groups of females and across months. Blubber cortisol levels also significantly decreased in 2021, a year when human presence along the WAP was greatly reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings provide a critical baseline of cortisol levels for whales in a rapidly changing region and show direct relationships between cortisol levels and human presence. These are some of the first non-lethal quantitative observations of the demography and population dynamics of recovering whale populations in the Antarctic and provide a critical reference point for future work as the Antarctic climate continues to change and populations continue to recover from whaling.

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore