1,721,051 research outputs found

    On the bielliptic and bihyperelliptic loci

    No full text
    We study some particular loci inside the moduli space M_g, namely the bielliptic locus (i.e. the locus of curves admitting a 2:1 cover over an elliptic curve E) and the bihyperelliptic locus (i.e. the locus of curves admitting a 2:1 cover over a hyperelliptic curve C′, g(C′)≥2). We show that the bielliptic locus is not a totally geodesic subvariety of A_g if g≥4 (while it is for g=3, see [16]) and that the bihyperelliptic locus is not totally geodesic in A_g if g≥3g′. We also give a lower bound for the rank of the second gaussian map on the generic point of the bielliptic locus and an upper bound for this rank for every bielliptic curve

    Study of protectives obtained from natural resources for the conservation of stone

    No full text
    Stone monuments and artefacts are the largest part of the cultural heritage and the Science for Conservation studies innovative protective and consolidant products. In this work, three polymers were obtained from lactic acid and their behavior was tested as protectives: PLLA, PLLA-FLK, PLDA-FLK. The last two products were copolymers containing a perfluoropolyether moiety in order to improve their hydrophobicity and stability. The polymers were synthesized through ROP (Ring Opening Polymerization), and characterized using different techniques like NMR and FT-IR spectroscopies, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The polymers were tested as protectives on four different types of stones examining their efficiency and colorimetric variations when applied on the samples. Ageing tests were performed both on natural (in laboratory and outdoor) and artificial (climatic chamber, UV radiation) conditions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore