1,721,010 research outputs found
sj-pdf-1-jom-10.1177_01492063231162094 - Supplemental material for Event-Oriented Organizational Behavior Research: A Multilevel Review and Agenda for Future Research
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jom-10.1177_01492063231162094 for Event-Oriented Organizational Behavior Research: A Multilevel Review and Agenda for
Future Research by Dong Liu, Frederick P. Morgeson, Jinlong Zhu, and Xueqing Fan in Journal of Management</p
sj-docx-1-jom-10.1177_01492063231179405 - Supplemental material for How Culture Shapes the Influence of Work Design Characteristics: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-jom-10.1177_01492063231179405 for How Culture Shapes the Influence of Work Design Characteristics: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review by Kameron M. Carter, Andrea L. Hetrick, Meng Chen, Stephen E. Humphrey, Frederick P. Morgeson, and Brian J. Hoffman in Journal of Management</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
