8 research outputs found
P2Y and P2X Purinoceptors are Respectively Implicated in Endothelium- Dependent Relaxation and Eedothelium Independent Contraction in Human Corpus Cavernosum
No full text
Endothelin-1: a predictor of extracapsular extension in clinically localized prostate cancer?
No full text
Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
No full textBackground: Overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment are important side effects of screening for, and early detection of, prostate cancer (PCa). Active surveillance (AS) is of growing interest as an alternative to radical treatment of low-risk PCa. Objective: To update our experience in the largest worldwide prospective AS cohort. Design, setting, and participants: Eligible patients had clinical stage T1/T2 PCa, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 6 at repeat biopsy. Recommendation for treatment was triggered in case of PSA doubling time <3 yr or reclassification. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors for reclassification at repeat biopsy. Active therapy-free survival (ATFS) was assessed with a Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of clinical characteristics with active therapy over time. Results and limitations: In total, 2494 patients were included and followed for a median of 1.6 yr. One or more repeat biopsies were performed in 1480 men, of whom 415 men (28%) showed reclassification. Compliance with the first repeat biopsy was estimated to be 81%. During follow-up, 527 patients (21.1%) underwent active therapy. ATFS at 2 yr was 77.3%. The strongest predictors for reclassification and switching to deferred treatment were the number of positive cores (two cores compared with one core) and PSA density. The disease-specific survival rate was 100%. Follow-up was too short to draw definitive conclusions about the safety of AS. Conclusions: Our short-term data support AS as a feasible strategy to reduce overtreatment. Clinical characteristics and PSA kinetics during follow-up can be used for risk stratification. Strict monitoring is even more essential in men with high-risk features to enable timely recognition of potentially aggressive disease and offer curative intervention. Limitations of using surrogate end points and markers in AS should be recognized
Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for Grade Group 1 prostate cancer and the impact of the use of MRI on overtreatment
No full textObjectivesTo present the long-term outcomes of men with Grade Group (GG) 1 prostate cancer (PCa), included in the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study, and to assess the effect of the inclusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the active surveillance (AS) protocol.Patients and MethodsThe PRIAS study is a multicentre, prospective, web-based cohort study monitoring patients on AS. In total, 8910 men with GG1 PCa were followed in 169 centres worldwide. The cumulative incidences of definitive treatment, metastasis and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) were estimated using competing risk analyses. Additionally, multivariable analysis was performed to assess the risk of reclassification, stratified by MRI performed around the time of diagnosis.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of definitive treatment 15 years post-diagnosis was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53-57). For metastasis, the 15-year cumulative incidence was 2.7% (95% CI 1.5-4.4). Eight men of died from PCa, resulting in a 15-year cumulative PCSM incidence of 0.23% (95% CI 0.09-0.54). Compared to men with no MRI around the time of diagnosis, those who underwent MRI during the first 18 months of AS were associated with a significantly higher risk of reclassification to >= GG2, while men with a positive MRI before diagnosis were associated with a higher risk of reclassification to GG2, but not to >= GG3. Men with GG2 PCa on MRI-targeted rebiopsy who underwent definitive treatment did not show a statistically significant higher risk of 5-year disease recurrence compared to those who had GG1 PCa on last biopsy during AS.ConclusionsOur study confirms the safety of AS for GG1 PCa, with low metastasis and PCSM rates over 15 years. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in AS prompts increased detection of GG2, leading to increased treatment rates despite similar short-term risks. To minimise overtreatment, expanding eligibility for AS and the uptake of AS in men with favourable GG2 PCa is crucial to address the stage shift resulting from the increased accuracy of MRI
