1,722,245 research outputs found
Franz, H. — Okologie der Hochgebirge. Stuttgart, Engen Ulmer, 1979
No full textBourlière François. Franz, H. — Okologie der Hochgebirge. Stuttgart, Engen Ulmer, 1979. In: Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie), tome 34, n°1, 1980. p. 147
C. G. Lichtenberg : Gedankenbucher. Hg. von Franz H. Mautner, 1984
No full textBourel Dominique. C. G. Lichtenberg : Gedankenbucher. Hg. von Franz H. Mautner, 1984. In: Dix-huitième Siècle, n°17, 1985. Le protestantisme français en France. p. 432
Écologie de la Haute Montagne : Franz (H.), Ökologie der Hochgebirge
No full textTricart Jean. Écologie de la Haute Montagne : Franz (H.), Ökologie der Hochgebirge. In: Annales de Géographie, t. 91, n°507, 1982. pp. 624-626
Franz H. Mueller, The Church and the Social Question, 1984
No full textDaude Jeannine. Franz H. Mueller, The Church and the Social Question, 1984. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°26, novembre 1985. Le paysage américain. p. 473
Fibel für die evangelischen Volksschulen Württembergs
No full textBilder von Franz H. Gref und Alfred H. Pellegrin
Hör' ich das Liedchen klingen : Op. 5. No. 11. / Robert Franz. [H. Heine]
No full textHÖR' ICH DAS LIEDCHEN KLINGEN : OP. 5. NO. 11. / ROBERT FRANZ. [H. HEINE]
Hör' ich das Liedchen klingen : Op. 5. No. 11. / Robert Franz. [H. Heine] (1)
Titelseite (1)
Inhalt. (2)
1. Hör' ich das Liedchen klingen. Op. 5. No. 11. (3)
2. Ich hab' in Deinem Auge. Op. 5. No. 6. (4)
3. Ich lobe mir die Vögelein. Op. 5. No. 8. (6
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
