1,721,163 research outputs found
A projected SQP method for nonlinear optimal control with quadratic convergence
In this paper, we propose a discrete-time Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) algorithm for nonlinear optimal control problems. Using the idea by Hauser of projecting curves onto the trajectory space, the introduced algorithm has guaranteed recursive feasibility of the dynamic constraints. The second essential feature of the algorithm is a specific choice of the Lagrange multiplier update. Due to this ad hoc choice of the multiplier, the algorithm converges locally quadratically. Finally, we show how the proposed algorithm connects standard SQP methods for nonlinear optimal control with the Projection Operator Newton method by Hauser
Distributed robust optimization via Cutting-Plane Consensus
This paper addresses the problem of robust optimization in large-scale networks of identical processors. General convex optimization problems are considered, where uncertain constraints are distributed to the processors in the network. The processors have to compute a maximizer of a linear objective over the robustly feasible set, defined as the intersection of all locally known feasible sets. We propose a novel asynchronous algorithm, based on outer-approximations of the robustly feasible set, to solve such problems. Each processor stores a small set of linear constraints that form an outer-approximation of the robustly feasible set. Based on its locally available information and the data exchange with neighboring processors, each processor repeatedly updates its local approximation. A computational study for robust linear programming illustrates that the completion time of the algorithm depends primarily on the diameter of the communication graph and is independent of the network size
A Polyhedral Approximation Framework for Convex and Robust Distributed Optimization
In this paper, we consider a general problem setup for a wide class of convex and robust distributed optimization problems in peer-to-peer networks. In this setup, convex constraint sets are distributed to the network processors who have to compute the optimizer of a linear cost function subject to the constraints. We propose a novel fully distributed and asynchronous algorithm, named cutting-plane consensus, to solve the problem, based on a polyhedral outer approximation of the constraint sets. Processors running the algorithm compute and exchange linear approximations of their locally feasible sets. Independently of the number of processors in the network, each processor stores only a small number of linear constraints, making the algorithm scalable to large networks. The cutting-plane consensus algorithm is presented and analyzed for the general framework. Specifically, we prove the correctness of the algorithm, and show its robustness against communication or processor failures. Then, the cutting-plane consensus algorithm is specified to three different classes of distributed optimization problems, namely 1) inequality constrained problems, 2) robust optimization problems, and 3) almost separable optimization problems. For each one of these problem classes we solve a concrete problem and present computational results. That is, we show how to solve: position estimation in wireless sensor networks, a distributed robust linear program, and a distributed microgrid control problem
Locally Constrained Decision Making via Two-Stage Distributed Simplex
In this paper we propose a distributed algorithm for solving linear programs with combinations of local and global constraints in a multi-agent setup. A fully distributed and asynchronous algorithm is proposed. The computation of the local decision makers involves the solution of two distinct (local) optimization problems, namely a local copy of a global linear program and a smaller problem used to generate ”problem columns”. We show that, when running the proposed algorithm, all decision makers agree on a common optimal solution, even if the original problem has several optimal solutions, or detect unboundedness and infeasibility if necessary
A distributed solution to the adjustable robust economic dispatch problem
The problem of maintaining balance between consumption and production of electric energy in the presence of a high share of intermittent power sources in a transmission grid is addressed. A distributed, asynchronous optimization algorithm, based on the ideas of cutting-plane approximations and adjustable robust counterparts, is presented to compute economically optimal adjustable dispatch strategies. These strategies guarantee satisfaction of the power balancing constraint as well as of the operational constraints for all possible realizations of the uncertain power generation or demand. The communication and computational effort of the proposed distributed algorithm increases for each computational unit only slowly with the number of participants, making it well suited for large scale networks. A distributed implementation of the algorithm and a numerical study are presented, which show the performance in asynchronous networks and its robustness against packet loss
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
