1,721,005 research outputs found

    Frangipane M. (ed.). 2007. Arslantepe Cretulae. An Early Centralised Administrative System before Writing

    No full text
    Frangipane M. (ed.). 2007. Arslantepe Cretulae. An Early Centralised Administrative System before Writing. In: Paléorient, 2007, vol. 33, n°2. pp. 172-175

    Frangipane M. (ed.). 2007. Arslantepe Cretulae. An Early Centralised Administrative System before Writing

    No full text
    Frangipane M. (ed.). 2007. Arslantepe Cretulae. An Early Centralised Administrative System before Writing. In: Paléorient, 2007, vol. 33, n°2. pp. 172-175

    The “Slave Mode of Production” and perspectives of comparison

    No full text
    The slave as res, as a thing, as part of the slave labour taken into account by Marx is evidently not sufficient to explain the development of Roman economy in which not only freedmen but also the servi, the slaves, carried out economically relevant operations often unbeknownst to their owners. So if on one hand the Marxist analysis of slave societies is always a base from which to start studying the economic and commercial structures of Rome, we need undeniably to examine other dependency situations in which the slave was not a mere object but rather one of the actors of Roman economic life, as the filii familias

    Frangipane M. (ed.) 2010. Economic Centralisation in Formative States. The Archaeological Reconstruction of the Economic System in 4th Millennium Arslantepe. Roma : Sapienza Università di Roma (Studi di Preistoria Orientale 3).

    No full text
    Butterlin Pascal. Frangipane M. (ed.) 2010. Economic Centralisation in Formative States. The Archaeological Reconstruction of the Economic System in 4th Millennium Arslantepe. Roma : Sapienza Università di Roma (Studi di Preistoria Orientale 3).. In: Paléorient, 2012, vol. 38, n°1-2. pp. 252-255

    Quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum l.) changes under different cover crops, soil tillage and nitrogen fertilization management

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interaction effects of winter cover crops (hairy vetch, subclover and black oat) and a bare soil, cover crop biomass management (incorporated into the soil or left on the soil surface as death mulch), and nitrogen (N) fertilization level (0, 75 and 150 kg ha−1 of N) on fruit yield and fruit quality parameters of processing tomato. Hairy vetch residues increased the yield (+57%), color index (+8%) and sugar/acidity ratio (+7%) of marketable tomato fruits compared to bare soil regardless of cover crop biomass management. Black oat residues determined a poor marketable yield, especially in tilled soil (on average, −26%, compared to bare soil) and they had a tendentially negative effect on some parameters of tomato quality (high firmness and titratable acidity, low color index and pH). Subclover residues, when incorporated into the soil, determined similar marketable fruit yield to bare soil, although they had a more favorable effect on the color parameters of tomato fruits. The increasing of the N fertilization level from 0 kg ha−1 of N to 150 kg ha−1 of N always positively influenced the tomato yield and fruit characteristics. The results suggest that hairy vetch, compared to other cover crops, had a positive influence on tomatoes and it could be part of an environmentally friendly management package for sustainable tomato cultivation in Mediterranean conditions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore