1,721,076 research outputs found

    Global Gene Expression Analysis of Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumour

    No full text
    Introduction: Currently, prognostic and therapeutic determinations for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) are primarily based on the histological grade. However, the prognostic value of this latter is still highly questionable. In the present study, MCT transcriptome was characterized to identify a set of candidate genes potentially useful for MCT classification and prognosis prediction. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two canine MCT biopsies were enrolled in the study. Isolated and purified total RNAs were individually hybridized to the Agilent Canine V2 4x44k DNA microarray. Normalized data were analyzed by using SAM (Significant Analysis of Microarray), PAM (Prediction Analysis of Microarray) and TMeV tools. Furthermore, a Functional Annotation bioinformatic tool (DAVID) was used to classify modulated genes. Results: PAM identified 14 transcripts providing the greatest accuracy of class prediction into two classes (mostly referable to High and Low grade MCTs) with a misclassification error equal to 0. The functional analysis of genes differentially expressed (597) between the aforementioned two groups provided evidence that they were involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, p53 signaling pathway, nucleotide excision repair and pyrimidine metabolism. The PCA of all samples, made by using this same panel of genes, clearly identified two clusters (the first two components accounted for the 90.9% of total variance). Conclusions: The molecular characterization of canine MCT transcriptome allowed the identification of a gene set that clearly separate differentiated and undifferentiated MCTs. This might potentially be helpful for MCT classification and prognosis. Supporting grants: RC IZS VE 04/1

    Network for Monitoring Honey Bee Mortality and Colony Losses in Italy as a Part of the APENET Research Project

    No full text
    Honey bee and colony mortality have been reported for several years in many countries as well as in Italy. In the last years this phenomenon has become increasingly serious, and several hypotheses have been proposed to explain honey bee and colony losses. These hypotheses relate to pests and diseases, pesticides, apicultural practices, climate change, electromagnetic fields, GMO crops, etc. Honey bee colony losses are being surveyed in several European countries, but these surveys are not sufficiently structured. Based on beekeepers’ reports, honey bee losses in Italy follow a clear seasonal pattern: a) during spring and summer colonies lose many foragers due to agrochemicals (bee losses); b) from late summer to winter, the impact of pests (including Varroa) and pathogens becomes more important (colony losses). To assess the extent and investigate the possible causes of honey bee and colony losses in Italy a national monitoring network needs to be established. Target apiaries will be distributed in selected sites (modules), ideally one per region, to cover the national territory. Each module, composed of five apiaries with ten non-migratory colonies each, will be chosen based on environmental characteristics with a distance to the center of the module of about 50 km. Colonies will be visually inspected four times a year (right after winter, spring, summer and just before winter). In each inspection several parameters of each colony will be considered— health and nutritional condition, number of bees and brood, and queen’s age. The person in charge of each module will input the information obtained in a real-time database available on the Internet. In addition, dead and live bees, as well as several beehive matrices (brood, pollen, wax) will be collected during each inspection for chemical, pollen and disease analyses. The information collected through this honey-bee monitoring network will provide a broad database from which to explore patterns of disease, toxic exposure and management practices that may be linked to the occurrence of honey bee and colony losses. APENET aims at providing an accurate assessment of the overall health condition of honey bees at the national level

    First report in Italy of the dusky sap beetle, Carpophilus lugubris, a new potential pest for Europe

    No full text
    Following a report submitted by a beekeeper to Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, in Padua province (Borgoricco, Veneto, NE Italy), the authors discovered in April 2011 several specimens of the dusky sap beetle Carpophilus lugubris Murray 1864 (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) on the bottom board of some beehives. At a later time (May 2012), an isolated specimen was also collected within a Natural Reserve in Belluno province (Feltre, Veneto, NE Italy). These specimens represent the first known records of this species in Italy or Europe as a whole. This is also the first record of the species associated with beehives. This discovery led us to review the available bionomical and faunistic data for this widespread Nearctic and Neotropical species. C. lugubris is a recognized pest of corn, therefore is very important monitoring its possible dispersal into cornfields, beehives, and other agricultural regions of NE Italy and southern Europe over the next few years

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore