1,720,990 research outputs found
Bridging the gap between practice guidelines and clinical practice: results from a consumer-oriented evaluation of sexual aids
No full text<p><span>Sexual health is often negatively impacted by cancer therapies. Using a consumer-oriented approach, our aim was to identify non-pharmacologic sexual aids available online to increase knowledge of sexual health resources. NCCN Survivorship 1.2022 guidelines were used to identify 13 recommended non-pharmacologic SHA categories. For each category, an initial internet search evaluated the top 25 links for the “Best of”. We categorized hyperlinks by publication and author type and listed candidate SHAs. In May 2023, we used 7-8 websites (3 mainstream, 4 sexual health sites +/- manufacturer) to record each candidate SHA customer rating on a 5-star scale. Inclusion required a minimum of 50 ratings and a 4.0 star average.</span></p>
<p><span>There were 874 potential items, mostly (60.3%) from magazines, newspapers, and blog posts. 535 met criteria for potential therapeutic value. 287 items meeting our customer-reported quality threshold, with a median of 631 reviews (range: 51-128,481) and a median rating of 4.4 stars (4.0-5.0). We identified a median of 7 (1-107) SHAs per NCCN category. </span></p>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Recommended from our members
Use of Frailty to Predict Survival in Elderly Patients With Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
No full textPurpose: Frailty has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality independent of age, but studies are lacking in radiation oncology. This study evaluates a modified frailty index (mFI) in predicting overall survival (OS) and non-cancer death for Stage I/II [N0M0] Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).
Methods: Medical records for all patients with Stage I/II NSCLC treated at our institution with SBRT from 2009-2014 were reviewed. A validated mFI score, consisting of 11 variables was calculated, classifying patients as non-frail (0-1) or frail (≥2). Primary endpoint (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank. Secondary endpoint, non-cancer death, was analyzed using Fine-Gray’s method, with death from lung cancer as a competing risk.
Results: Patient cohort consisted of 38 (27.3%) non-frail and 101 (72.7%) frail [median total mFI score 3.0 (range 0-7)]. Median age and pack-year history was 74 and 46 years, respectively. Median follow-up among survivors was 38.5 months (range 4.0-74.1 months). Frailty was associated with a lower 3-year OS (37.3% vs. 74.7%; p=0.004) and 3-year cumulative incidence of non-cancer death (36.7% vs. 12.5%; p=0.02). Frailty remained significant in the multivariate model [OS HR for mFI ≥2: 2.25 (1.14-4.44); p=0.02].
Conclusion: Frailty is associated with lower OS in elderly patients with early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT, yet frail patients survived a median 2.5 years, and were more likely to die of causes unrelated to the primary lung cancer, suggesting SBRT should be considered even in older patients deemed unfit for surgery.Scholarly Projec
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
